first of all, if "titi.com" and "toto.titi.com" are real names, then I'd
switch jobs - this would drive me crazy ;-)

Rgd. adding the directReports to the PAS: that would be nice, but isn't
possible for the backlinks of linked attribute-pairs - this is the case
here for the directReports attribute => it is not a replicated attribute
at all (neither cross domain nor within the same domain), as only
forward links (here the manager attribute) get replicated between
DC/GCs.  

Instead, the backlink attributes are processed locally on each DC when
it receives the forward-link (e.g. a user object's manager attribute)
and creates the link between the two respective AD objects via an entry
in the local link table on the DC/GC.


However, the forward-link will only replicate to DCs hosting the
respective naming context. And for attributes (even forward links),
which are also in the PAS (configured to replicate to the GC), this
means that the information is also replicated to GCs from another
domain(s), hosting a read-only partition of the source domain (of an
object with a forward link). And the GCs will then again create the
respective backlink locally, when making the entry in the linktable,
even for cross-domain links.

For the given manager/directReport example this means that a user's
manager attribute is only replicated to DCs of the same domain and to
GCs in the forest - and that only these machines populate the respective
"directReports" attribute (backlink) for a user who is a manager of this
other user. As such, you won't see cross-domain directReports
information on a DC of a manager's domain, if this DC is not a GC. 


So here, the DC for "titi.com" used to lookup the directReports
attribute "usertiti" must have been a GC, while the DC of
"toto.titi.com" used to lookup the directReports attribute "usertoto"
must have been just a normal DC.


This is not to be confused with Phantom Records (which are updated via
the Infrastructure Master): as the directReports attribute is not the
replicated attribute, it is also not updated or replicated as a phantom
record via the IM.  
However, phantom records are created on non-GC DCs to replicate the
manager-attribute (forward-link) to other DCs, if e.g. a user's
manager-attribute is linked to a user-object outside the own domain. As
Dean perfectly described, the IM is then responsible to sync changes to
the linked object over time (renames, deletes etc.), but it would not
update any backlinks.


As a sidenote on the replication of the manager/directReports links you
should realize, that if you do leverage these accross domains in a
forest and you accidentally delete a manager (with direct-reports in
various domains) whom you must then authoritatively restore in AD, the
links to the manager's directReports are NOT recovered with the
manager... (same issue as with memberships in Universal Groups or Domain
Local groups in other Domains of the forest)

\Guido


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jimmy Andersson
Sent: Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2004 11:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Replication of linked attributes between domain
and sub-domain

 If you really want/need it to be replicated to the GCs, you can use the
Schema snap-in, and check the box in front of 'Replicate this attribute
to
the Global Catalog'.

Regards,
/Jimmy
-------------------------------------
    Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB         
         Principal Advisor     
 Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
---------- www.qadvice.com ---------- 



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Replication of linked attributes between domain
and
sub-domain

The manager attribute is replicated between GCs as part of the Partial
Attribute Set.  The directReports attribute isn't.  Whether you see it
or
not will depend on the domain of the DC you are querying.

Tony

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
Wrom: BLVLMHAALPTCXLYRWTQTIPWIGYOKSTTZRCLBDXRQBGJSNBO
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:02:34 +0200

Hi,

I have a domain "titi.com" with a sub-domain "toto.titi.com", a user
"usertiti" on "domain titi.com" and a user "usertoto" on "domain
toto.titi.com".
I set "usertiti" as manager of "usertoto" and "usertoto" as manager of
"usertiti". 
When I look a the "usertoto" and "usertiti" entries in the directories,
I
have:
- the manager attribute of "usertiti" is correctly set at "usertoto",
- the directReports attribute of "usertiti" is correctly set at
"usertoto",
- the manager attribute of "usertoto" is correctly set at "usertiti",
- but, the directReports attribute of "usertoto" is not correctly set at
"usertiti" !

Why ? Is it normal or is it a replication problem ?

Thanks in advance for your answers...


Solange Desseignes


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

 




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org


 
                   
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to