|
Some companies may be going overboard but it will be tough
to tell until the first lucky few go to jail to really know for sure. I can
think of a few I wouldn't mind being made examples of. :o)
I think the idea of least permissions is a great idea no
matter if their is a jail term behind it or not. If people kept things properly
locked down they wouldn't have to be so concerned about DR and auditing and
wondering how the heck this that or the other thing happened.
joe From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Creamer, Mark Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 1:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance I’m curious what, if any, changes to everyday administration the folks on this list are making in preparation for Sarbannes Oxley compliance. Specifically, is anyone making a conscious effort to remove daily admin rights from people whose job it is to do domain administration, in favor of a “break the glass when needed” type of philosophy? I’m just starting to look into this, but I’m getting the feeling some companies are going overboard. Any observation from the group is always welcome…
Mark Creamer |
- [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Creamer, Mark
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Raymond McClinnis
- Re: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance joe
- Re: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Fugleberg, David A
- Re: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Brent Westmoreland
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Menten, Jeff
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Sunil Gupta
- RE: [ActiveDir] Sarbannes Oxley compliance Justin_Leney
