Hi
Joe,
The bridgehead servers are designated to satisfy my
security guys so that a minimum number of firewall conduits need to be defined
for DCs in separate sites. The recent addition of a second bridgehead
server was at the suggestion of my co-worker who likes redundancy.
8-)
Mike
Thommes
-----Original Message-----
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] displaying multiple preferred bridgehead servers?Is there a reason you are configuring any servers specifically to be bridgeheads or are you doing it because someone said you should?joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M.
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 9:17 AM
To: Active Directory Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir] displaying multiple preferred bridgehead servers?Yesterday I made one of my root domain controllers a bridgehead server. It joins the first bridgehead server that I created early on with another root domain controller. The enterprise dcdiag report I run each morning shows no indication of the new bridgehead server. I read (http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/13420/13420.html) where you can have multiple bridgehead servers but only one of the servers is active at a time. I also see using the replmon utilty/view_enterprise_bridgehead_servers that only my first bridgehead server shows up. I would think that both should show with maybe some mark indicating active/non-active state. My site also has another bridgehead server and it does show up but it belongs to a child domain. Should that make a difference? Has anyone experienced this situation before? I am expecting too much? Am I misconfigured? TIA!Mike Thommes
