Nah, Windows Server 2003 is. :oP

Heh.


  joe 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SP4

Sure but it's still the best version of W2K so far.

ddh

> I'd read this-
> 
> 
http://www.winnetmag.com/Article/ArticleID/39584/39584.
html
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Salandra, Justin A. 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] SP4
> 
> 
> So I guess it is safe to say that SP4 should be safe
to deploy since not
> to many people have posted problems with the SP here
on the list and I
> have not seen too many things written about problems
arising from it.?
> 
> Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
> Senior Network Engineer
> Catholic Healthcare System
> 212.752.7300 - office
> 917.455.0110 - cell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%
40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%
40mail.activedir.org/




List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to