In terms of Exchange, we've found that a DC with unusually busy bind times is what makes Exchange go crazy. :) We keep a pretty good eye on that now...
If DSACCESS wasn't a complete piece of sh!t3, Exchange wouldn't be so sensitive about DC problems. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DC Performance Monitoring That's a strange one to find good information for. So far, I've found the best information in the Exchange troubleshooting guide. Exchange is so sensitive and dependent on Active Directory it made sense to put that information in there. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/library Al -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 8:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] DC Performance Monitoring What are the best counters to watch to determine if a DC is being overloaded, and what kind of thresholds should I be looking at? I know a bridgehead server might reasonably be busy, but what are some guidelines I should be looking for? Thx List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
