Daniel

Well, one option would be to simply skip the Global Group part and add your accounts 
directly to the UG.  

A problem with UGs in Windows 2000 AD was that they potentially created a lot of 
replication traffic between GCs.  Any change to a UG membership would result in the 
whole membership being replicated.  Windows 2003 AD offers Linked Value Replication 
(LVR), which allows individual group membership changes to be replicate, rather than 
the whole attribute.  This is clearly much more efficient and removes this limitation 
on the use of UGs.

In any case, wouldn't having Global Groups nested in UGs cause a problem for 
Distribution Groups expansion?  For example, how would a GC from DomainA manage to 
successfully expand a distribution group that contains Global Groups from DomainB?  

Tony  _____  

From: Cariglia, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Montag, 26. Juli 2004 22:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] group structure -universal groups


Hello,
 
            I have a question regarding group structure and administration
of such.  We run a multi-domain AD environment with basically an empty root
domain and 2 child domains where the users live.  The problem is if we
structure groups the way it is recommended (accounts into Global groups
which are then placed into Universal Groups which are then placed into
Domain Local groups in the domain where the resource lives and permissions
applied using the Domain local group.  
            The problem is we prefer our distribution lists (universal
groups) to be managed/administered by the users/owner of the list.   All
distribution lists are composed of individual users presently (came from an
NT 4 domain) and if we follow the recommended group practices we will nest
the Global group(s) from both domains inside the Universal groups and remove
the individual users presently in them and effectively they will have the
same members, but when the owners try to modify the members through their
Outlook client they will only see the Global group(s) and not the members of
the group who will receive the messages sent to the distribution list.  Is
there a better way to administer permissions in a multi domain Active
Directory environment or do we set every owner of a distribution list up
with rights and a tool to manage the global groups effectively adding these
users to the Universal groups by nesting the global groups?   Any feedback
is appreciated, thank you.
 
 


 




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.activedir.org


 
                   
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to