You guys are too funny. If the choice were between Leno and reading some of the posts on this list, I think I would take this list. Come to think of it, if the choice were between getting bamboo shoved under my nails and watching Leno, I might just choose the former. Well, needless to say, I got lots of laughs out of this thread. But basically, I regret a bit including the bit about Exchange. Though the discussion led me to wonder, would you put the database on the NAS or the logs? Or both? Is it the disk subsystem on a NAS that causes the concern or the connectivity? I suppose finally, after dealing with all the foo, does NAS really lower your true cost per gigabyte? Oh, just so I don't lose site of the original question, you all seem to be in consensus that if budget allows go DAS and go SCSI. NAS is ok for file sharing, particularly with directories that are infrequently accessed or just read from. (I may be summarizing some Google findings here as well). Do I have that basically right? nme
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
