-----Original Message----- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 11:13 AM To: Mulnick, Al Subject: FW: [ActiveDir] way OT
Feel free to forward if it looks useful. -----Original Message----- From: Webb, Andy Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 10:10 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] way OT 2000/2003 implementations still rely on an x500 address, the legacyExchangeDN. Outlook still stores that address in address objects within the messages. If you want to break the Reply function, change the legacyExchangeDN. :) On the other hand, knowing this means that if you need to change the legacyExchangeDN value for some reason, you can work around it. Once you change legacyExchangeDN to the new value, you can add an additional x500 type address to proxyAddresses that consists of the old value. This can be useful in site/org consolidations, etc. One thing that doesn't work that way though is folder permissions. Folder permissions (like when you delegate rights for someone to read your calendar) are tied to the legacyExchangeDN value also. They will not resolve against a secondary x500 address, however. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:02 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] way OT After re-reading that, I should have added it's a method for defining a cross-reference to an external directory as well. I'll try to be more complete in the future - it's a new leaf I'm turning over ;) -ajm -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 4:19 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] way OT It's possible they didn't know :) X.500 is AKA PDN (parent distinguished name). 5.5 implementations (when Outlook was written) used X.400 transport and a X.500-like directory. Using the X.500 address of the user on the target migration system allows Outlook to resolve the originator's address in most cases. This KB helps to explain how it gets derived and what it means to OL/cached mode. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;839826 Al -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 3:37 PM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] way OT How used is the x.500 adress namespace in exchange 2000 and to what end? thanks, i couldn't get any response from the exchange list(maybe because my queston is so stupid?) List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
