I have been able to reproduce the behavior in both our test and
production forests on several DCs. GPO has been applied a while ago,
boxes have been rebooted more than once and RSoP shows the right
settings. 
More than that, when I look at
c:\windows\security\templates\policies\gpt00001.inf (which contains the
settings pulled from DC's GPO, I see line like this:
MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\LSA\CrashOnAuditFail=4,0
and the registry has CrashOnAuditFail set to 0 (disabled).


void *Guy;
(you guys are contagious ;) )  

On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 00:05, Mulnick, Al wrote:
> Sounds like the feature isn't working as expected if the box continues to
> work until reboot. It's also possible it was triggered prior to the GPO
> being applied, but you'd have to repro to know IMHO.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy Teverovsky
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 5:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] By design or configurable ?
> 
> Right, but this feature was turned off in GPO, so the box was not supposed
> to crash. 
> And how would you explain the working replication (with full security
> logs) till the box is rebooted manually and only then enters the "crashed"
> state ?
> 
> We indeed have a policy for keeping 3 months of security logs and meanwhile
> it takes between one to two weeks to fill the logs, but this is a new forest
> and users keep arriving, so eventually we will need to implement a more
> serious approach.
> 
> Guy
> 
> On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 23:37, Mulnick, Al wrote:
> >  
> > http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/all/
> > deploy 
> > guide/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/
> > all/de
> > ployguide/en-us/46686.asp?frame=true
> > 
> > This link is the documented behavior.  Sounds like that is what you're 
> > getting. I think there may be some misnaming involved in that it 
> > should actually restart if it says "crashondump" but whatever.
> > 
> > As for your situation, I know in some environments, 128mb wouldn't 
> > last two hours.  A process to collect the data at the end of the day 
> > would be too late.  That's what makes me suggest other methods. IMHO, 
> > there's a balance between collecting the data and self-configured 
> > denial of service. The key is to figure out how important that logging 
> > data is.  If it's important, such as in regulatory environments, then 
> > that indicates you really should have a process of collecting that 
> > data whenever it's written to the logs or very soon after.  If for 
> > security reasons, you have to stop service if unable to log security 
> > events, then so be it.  Just make sure you never run into that 
> > situation, right?  If you have that requirement, but don't prevent 
> > your systems from ever running into that situation, then it is by default
> acceptable to have occasional DoS events.
> > 
> > Your system did crash when it was full.  Normal operations failed to 
> > continue and the LSA stopped for that particular DC.  It's a testament 
> > to your architecture if the users never noticed :)
> > 
> > Al
> >  
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy 
> > Teverovsky
> > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 4:24 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] By design or configurable ?
> > 
> > 
> > Interesting...
> > 
> > I have "Audit: Shutdown system immediately if unable to log security
> audits"
> > set to disabled and security log size configured to 128Mb (DCs
> > GPO)
> > 
> > We are keeping 3 months back of security logs, hence the GPO is 
> > configured not to override the security logs. DCs have a scheduled 
> > task that pops up once a day and archives/clears the security logs - 
> > not the state of the art solution, but does the work without 
> > purchasing any additional software. I would love to give MOM a try, 
> > but we already have OpenView in place, so I'll be checking with OvO people
> if the security logs can be handled by OvO.
> > 
> > So in this configuration, if booted with full security logs, I 
> > experience the same behavior as CrashOnAuditFail set to 2 (box in 
> > crashed mode) - verified that by adding peer DC to builtin 
> > Administrators group and the replication resumed.
> > 
> > Am I missing something or this is not the desired behavior when the DC 
> > is configured not to crash on audit ?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Guy
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 16:10, Mulnick, Al wrote:
> > > I suppose in theory, setting it to crash on full is also a security 
> > > risk since it could be used to cause a denial of service.
> > > 
> > > I'd guess that if you have something that siphons off the logs on 
> > > submit event, then it could be a workable solution.  I'd have to say 
> > > I'm not impressed with a lot of the tools currently out there that 
> > > do this due to the overhead they place on the machine, but it could 
> > > be done.  MOM Server is a good way to get this done IIRC.
> > > 
> > > I'm guessing that's what you had in mind, Rick?  Something that 
> > > clears it as it is written, vs a timed deal?
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gasper, 
> > > Rick
> > > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 9:02 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] By design or configurable ?
> > > 
> > > I have had the same problem, but setting the logs to overwrite is 
> > > bad system administration. IF a person attempt to break passwords, 
> > > thy can just flood the server with requests and eventually the log will
> clear.
> > > The best solution is to have the logs cleared by a script or third 
> > > party utility to clear and archive the logs every night.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Rick Gasper
> > > Manager, Network Services
> > > King's College
> > > 133 N. River St
> > > Wilkes-Barre PA  18711
> > > PH: 570-208-5845
> > > Fax: 570-208-6072
> > > Cell: 570-760-0335
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Depp, Dennis M.
> > > Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 6:48 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] By design or configurable ?
> > > 
> > > Guy,
> > > 
> > > One way to avoid the problems of a full security log is to set the 
> > > logs to overwrite as needed.  You can set this via group policy.
> > > 
> > > I don't know if the kerberos ticket is cached or not.  (I suspect
> > > not.) When a machine reconnects to the network and you attempt to 
> > > access a network resource, the resource will ask for you ticket.  If 
> > > you don't have one, or if it is out of date, the client will request 
> > > a new kerberos ticket and then be authenticated to the resource.
> > > 
> > > Denny
> > >  
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guy 
> > > > Teverovsky
> > > > Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 8:48 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: [ActiveDir] By design or configurable ?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > In my environment, when W2K3 DC boots with security logs full, the 
> > > > replication from that DC stops till the security log is cleared 
> > > > and the box is rebooted.
> > > > The interesting thing is that after the security logs become full 
> > > > (while the box is online) the replication continues to work till 
> > > > the box is rebooted with full log.
> > > > 
> > > > So the question is whether this can be prevented (we do have a 
> > > > routine which takes care of security logs archiving, but it failed 
> > > > on one of the DCs and I would like to prevent the replication from 
> > > > breaking again).
> > > > 
> > > > And another OT question:
> > > > When logging on to XP with cached credentials, is the Kerberos 
> > > > ticket cached too ? And if yes, what happens when the ticket 
> > > > expires and the box is reconnected to the network: will it 
> > > > seamlessly try to renew the ticked ?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Guy
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > Smith & Wesson - the original point and click interface
> > > > 
> > > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > > List archive: 
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > > 
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive: 
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > --
> > Smith & Wesson - the original point and click interface
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> --
> Smith & Wesson - the original point and click interface
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
-- 
Smith & Wesson - the original point and click interface

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to