>>Primary across the wan, secondary to itself?

Yes.



- ASB
  Cheap, Fast, Secure -- Pick Any TWO.
  http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/




On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:47:11 -0500, Rimmerman, Russ
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Could it be because the domain controller at all our remote sites has their
> network adapter properties set to the primary and secondary dns servers at
> the headquarters site?  How should the dns settings be on a DC that is
> running DNS in a remote site?  Primary across the wan, secondary to itself?
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Still troubleshooting, still no resolution
> 
> 
> 
> Russ, is server ldap/ccc.ourdomain.com your local DC in that site?
> And is this the site name CN=CAM-DHQ of that site?
>  
>  
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 11:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Still troubleshooting, still no resolution
> 
> 
> 
> I still have not found a resolution to my issue - our remote site's WAN link
> went down for many hours.  All the XP and 2000 desktops at that site could
> not connect to their mapped drives (to the local file server), and if they
> rebooted, they were totally toast.
>  
> There is a Windows 2000 domain controller at the site, but we are in a
> Win2003 AD domain.  Any ideas???
>  
> Errors generated in the system event log on the desktop:
>  
> 10/4/2004 10:27:58 AM Kerberos Error None 7 N/A CESVPL50835 The kerberos
> subsystem encountered a PAC verification failure.  This indicates that the
> PAC from the client CESVPL50835$ in realm CCC.OURDOMAIN.COM had a PAC which
> failed to verify or was modified.  Contact your system administrator.
> 10/4/2004 10:29:11 AM LSASRV Warning SPNEGO (Negotiator)  40961 N/A
> CESVPL50835 The Security System could not establish a secured connection
> with the server ldap/ccc.ourdomain.com.  No authentication protocol was
> available.
> 10/4/2004 10:29:11 AM LSASRV Warning SPNEGO (Negotiator)  40960 N/A
> CESVPL50835 "The Security System detected an attempted downgrade attack for
> server ldap/ccc.ourdomain.com.  The failure code from authentication
> protocol Kerberos was ""There are currently no logon servers available to
> service the logon request.
>  (0xc000005e)""."
>  
> Errors generated in the desktop event log on the server:
> 
> 
> The Directory Service consistency checker has noticed that 12 successive
> replication attempts with CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=CAMDHQDC02,CN=Servers,CN=CAM-DHQ,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ourdomain,DC=com
> have failed over a period of 132 minutes. The connection object for this
> server will be kept in place, and new temporary connections will established
> to ensure that replication continues. The Directory Service will continue to
> retry replication with CN=NTDS
> Settings,CN=CAMDHQDC02,CN=Servers,CN=CAM-DHQ,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ourdomain,DC=com;
> once successful the temporary connection will be removed. 
> 
> All servers in site CN=CAM-DHQ,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ourdomain,DC=com
> that can replicate partition DC=ccc,DC=coopcam,DC=com over transport
> CN=IP,CN=Inter-Site Transports,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ourdomain,DC=com
> are currently unavailable. 
> 
> The Directory Service consistency checker has determined that either (a)
> there is not enough physical connectivity published via the Active Directory
> Sites and Services Manager to create a spanning tree connecting all the
> sites containing the Partition DC=ourdomain,DC=com, or (b) replication
> cannot be performed with one or more critical servers in order for changes
> to propagate across all sites (most often due to the servers being
> unreachable). 
> 
> For (a), please use the Active Directory Sites and Services Manager to do
> one of the following: 
> 
> 1. Publish sufficient site connectivity information such that the system can
> infer a route by which this Partition can reach this site. This option is
> preferred. 
> 
> 2. Add an ntdsConnection object to a Domain Controller that contains the
> Partition DC=ourdomain,DC=com in this site from a Domain Controller that
> contains the same Partition in another site.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to