"Google-fu"? What's that? :-P
 
You should have checked my online "Windows" bookmarks first before posting
;). I rely on higher authorities (you know whom they are) to learn about
hidden stuff like these, although I admit that I only got to know about this
specific one through one of the TechEd sessions and a Webcast, and it still
does not appear to be well-documented.
 
 
Sincerely,

D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE MCSA MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Hunter, Laura E.
Sent: Fri 10/15/2004 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] 2K3 documentation update? (WAS: Windows Server 2003
Security Weirdness)



Remember my "I'm getting hammered with brute-force attacks as if 'Do not
allow enumeration of SAM' setting wasn't there even though it is" problem?

Found the solution today.

Remember the
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\LSA\RestrictAnonymous key
in 2000, that you needed to set to "2" to do any good?

Seems that's been deprecated in 2003, and the new correct value is split into
2 registry keys:

..\RestrictAnonymous=1
..\RestrictAnonymousSAM=1

Now, I've obviously only done this on my network, but I can tell you that a
setting of "2" in ..\RestrictAnonymous had me wide open and getting hammered
by account enumeration attacks, whereas changing it to a "1" now has my IPC$
share behaving the way I thought it should've been.

The kicker?  I can't find any mention of the change in an MS Article (though
Deji or someone will doubtless prove me wrong in about 5 seconds with their
superior Google-fu skills :-)).  And the Windows Server 2003 Deployment Kit
actually references "2" as a valid entry for ..\RestrictAnonymous.

Can anyone confirm or deny this before I go making a fool out of myself by
submitting an incorrect or redundant KB article?

Laura E. Hunter
MCSE, MVP - Windows Networking
University of Pennsylvania

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to