Douglas:

I have ~100 10.3.3/5 boxes/users authenticating against AD. Their home dirs are hosted on a w2k3 server and mount upon login. The authentication method is kerberos. Nothing needs to configured on the client side other than the AD plug-in.

See: http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2003/12/09/active_directory.html

specifically:

Best Of Class Single Sign-On support: Because of its automatic kerberos configuration (on joining the domain, a Kerberos configuration file is generated for the domain in question) users that have signed into a domain do not have to re-authenticate in order to mount shares from other member servers in the domain.

confusion:
http://www.afp548.com/articles/system/adplugin.html

makes it seem like you need to do something else (specifically step #5) to get this to work but this doesn't seem to apply (at least in my environ.).

hth,

john

Douglas M. Long wrote:
Yes, I agree, 10.3 is much easier, although in a 2k3 environment you will have problems mounting home drives on a 2k3 server because the mac samba client only use plain text passwords (whereas 2k3 disallows this by default). You can either allow it, which i wouldnt suggest, or mount your home drives on a machine other than 2k3. There is some speculation that 10.3.6 has some improvements in the way samba authenticates, but it is has not been confirmed yet. 10.3.6 is supposed to be out sometime within the next 30 days, if i remember correctly. If you do figure out how to mount home drives on a 2k3 file server with kerberos please let us know.

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Depp, Dennis M.
Sent: Fri 10/15/2004 7:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Macs, LDAP Source



Brian,

You might want to look at upgrading to 10.3.  Apple has improved on the
AD info for 10.3.  I've played with it a bit, but not enough to know if
the fault tolerance is there or not.

Denny


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 10:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Macs, LDAP Source

My asst managed to get OS X 10.2.SomeInt to authenticate to
the AD here. I typed in my username and password and it was
just as fast as logging in from an nt class box.  Aside from
the various implementation issues on the mac side, I have
this dilemma:



The Mac's are not actually AD aware - they just need an LDAP
source. I could buy this cool program called ADmitMac which
creates domain accounts for the Macs and emulates an NT box
as far as user mgmt goes on the Mac. Cool, but, the quote was
nearly as much as I paid for the OS X licenses. So, anyway,
the mac needs a explicit dns hostname for ldap. I could give
it one DC, but, if hat DC goes down, all my macs are F'ed.
So, what I did is setup a round-robin with all the DCs in the
site the macs are located in.



I'm not totally satisfied with this workaround. It just seems
sort of half-ass to me. It requires a certain degree of
management, and if one of the DCs is down, a portion for the
macs will need to be rebooted until they receive a referral
from the DNS server in an order which includes a working DC
first. Whilst I am not totally happy 100% with this solution,
I don't have a better idea - anybody? I remember hearing
about NLB for LDAP, which I think might do the trick, I've
never used MS NLB - does it apply to this situation?



Thanks.



--Brian Desmond

[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Payton on the web! www.wpcp.org <http://www.wpcp.org>



v - 773.534.0034 x135

f - 773.534.8101





List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/




-- John Singler Systems Administrator School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania 3800 Spruce Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6044

ph: 215.573.6525 fx: 215.573.8777
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to