Along with that, you may want to provide a lot more detail about why the person would say such a thing. For example, do you have one other connected site or do you have multi-national global sites here and on the moon?
Context is important prior to crucifixion. At face value though, it is unusual. ;) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Replication and the compression algorithm That would seem to be unusual. Possibly there is some mistunderstanding somewhere along the line. Have the Microsoft guy point you to documentation. If you want, name the Microsoft guy here and I am sure some other Microsoft guys will contact that person. Oh yeah list if the person was MCS, a TAM, or PSS. joe -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Hayes Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 7:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Replication and the compression algorithm We had a Microsoft guy tell us we will not benefit from the new compression algorithm in Windows 2003 if we have manually created connection objects. Does anyone agree with that? What does the compression algorithm have to do with the KCC and ISTG? Thanks, Shawn Hayes MCSE (2003, 2000, NT) Messaging Systems Engineer City of Virginia Beach (757) 219-2057 List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
