Well what are you trying to achieve? Digitally sign just ensures to the receiving arty that the packet has not been tampered with. Digitally encrypt ensures that nobody in between can read the contents of the packet.
Thanks. � --Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] Payton on the web! www.wpcp.org � v - 773.534.0034 x135 f - 773.534.8101 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ActiveDir] Which is better > > Digitally sign communications > > Or > > Digitally encrypt secure channel data > > Justin A. Salandra, MCSE > Senior Network Engineer > Catholic Healthcare System > 212.752.7300 - office > 917.455.0110 - cell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
