Not worked that much on the 3rd party integrations.....but have an idea

Can you try do Authentication re-directions to that site -> i mean
instead of people going to 3rd party site for authentication --> can
they come to your own website and get authenticated through your ldap
or RSA server and get re-directed to the desired locations.

Regards,
Chandra


On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:54:28 -0500, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ditto. Whomever is running that web site gets to see all of the clear text
> passwords for every user that authenticates. I would say that is giving out
> a bit more info to the third party than you would normally like to supply.
> Heck I don't even like doing that on intranet sites run by people in the
> same company let alone someone outside of the company. Sort of on par with
> saying, hi, here are my most sensitive parts and giving them to a third
> party and asking them to be nice to them. 
>  
>   joe
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 6:54 PM
> 
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> Interesting. I may just not understand what you have in mind.  
>  
> I would agree, but I'm leery of ldap bind for authentication in this
> scenario.  In addition, it seems that it would not really provide the full
> amount of usefulness to the solution since the user has to also remember a
> different set of creds if they use this portal with dual id.  Am I just
> misunderstanding, or were you thinking of something different??  
>  
> Al
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coleman, Hunter
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 4:44 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> Here's a common scenario, where an application like the web portal
> outsources authentication to an external directory but retains
> authorization....your user hits the web portal and gets a prompt for her
> login ID and password. She enters that information and hits the OK button,
> and your portal then attempts to do an authenticated bind to the user's
> object in the LDAP directory, using the submitted ID and password. If the
> bind is successful, then the LDAP directory returns a successful
> acknowledgement to the portal. The portal hears that the user ID and
> password are correct, so the portal can then present the user with the
> appropriate content based on the portal permissions assigned to her account.
>  
> The key here is that there has to be a common identifier in the portal and
> LDAP directory, so that the user gets the right stuff (based on the
> authorization in the portal) as a result of successful LDAP "login" (based
> on the LDAP authentication). Typically the common identifier is the logon
> ID, so that the portal knows that a successful LDAP bind to jane.doe should
> be associated with the jane.doe object in the portal.
>  
> It would be a good idea to ask what specific attributes the portal is
> looking for, or even the syntax of the LDAP queries they hope to issue.
>  
> Hunter
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert N. Leali
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> I understand what you are saying and agree.  On the same topic, what do you
> suggest is the best practice for having users authenticate to a third party
> web portal. Is it better to set up a one-way non-transitive trust between
> the two forests or domains, or go with an ldap export assuming this is going
> to be a long term solution.   The only thing we are trying to do is to allow
> our users to log into the third party web portal without having to learn an
> additional user name & password.  I do not want to give out any more
> information than that about my users. 
>  
> Thanks for the quick responses.
>  
> R- 
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mulnick, Al
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:27 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> not sure there are any documented risks.  Risks being relational to the
> entity taking them.
>  
> However, as a disinterested third party I'd have to point out that the risk
> is not technical in nature but rather about the information you're sharing. 
> I suppose the information you give out is far mare important to the
> conversation, but it seems you don't know these folks nor trust them really.
>  If that's the case, then it's possible you could be giving out the account
> information to a non-trusted source.  
>  
> The questions you need to ask are "what can they do with the information I
> provide and can I take any action to protect myself?"
>  
> Some folks wouldn't have a problem giving out that information.  Others
> would.  You'll need to assess that risk based on the information you plan to
> give out.
>  
> Email addresses are a unique identifier by the way.  And usually public
> knowledge.
> ________________________________
> From: Robert N. Leali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Robert N. Leali
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:18 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> That's correct.  Looking for risks associated .... 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mulnick, Al
> Sent: Thu 1/20/2005 2:05 PM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> 
> 
> Are you looking for risks associated with giving your directory away to a
> semi-trusted third party?  Did I paraphrase that correctly?
> 
> Al
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert N. Leali
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] LDAP export pros/cons
> 
> Can someone point me to a white paper or article that gives the pros and
> cons and security implications of allowing a semi-trusted third-party to
> access our AD with an LDAP export to an RSA server?
> 
> We are being asked to allow our users to authenticate to a third party web
> portal using their current Windows 2003 AD accounts.  The third party wants
> an LDAP export to their RSA server and  an account that has appropriate
> access to allow authentication to the AD box.  This is in an extra-net
> environment.
> 
> Any guidance or advice would be appreciated.
> 
> Robert
> ----
> The information contained in this e-mail transmittal, including any attached
> document(s) is confidential. The information is intended only for the use of
> the named recipient. If you are not the named recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any use, disclosure, copying, or distribution of the contents
> hereof is strictly prohibited.
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to