You'd be surprised how similar alike we are.  In fact, in public, most would
think we're twins except that he hasn't received his cafeteria MVP award yet
;)

<seriously> Either way, I am interested to hear what you get back from the
legal-beagles.  </seriously>

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stockbrugger, Brian
L.
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question

Sorry I mistyped and meant you (Al) and not Deji - my bad.  I finished
reading one of his posts before I sent this out and had his name on my mind.
I think those educators are rubbing off on me.

Brian
-----Original Message-----
From: Mulnick, Al [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 8:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question

I missed Deji's post but I'd be interested to hear the legal team's response
to the intended recipient issue if you could post that back.  More of a
curiuosity issue, but I'm insanely curious about things ;)

Al 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stockbrugger, Brian
L.
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question

Well I am no lawyer either but the disclaimer was attached at the request
(directive) of our legal team.  They also came up with the content of the
message.  I have not been following the specifics behind it but I was told
(legal term - hearsay) that it was a direct result of some litigation and
recent legislation here in CA.  Again I have no specifics but will do a
little checking.  It also had something to do with showing due diligence
since we are in public education and a lot of correspondence with parents,
colleagues, and the state/feds happen via e-mail.  Educators have been known
to not be the most technical bunch and are often sending email to the wrong
person (not sure how the "intended recipient" falls into that like Deji
points out).  However, the thought has been that if the recipient is clearly
not the intended recipient that they do the right thing and delete the
message instead of forwarding it on for some other gain.  There are a lot of
people critical of public education that would love to get information on a
student's IEP and show the "tax payer's money at work".

 

Other than that it is just more overhead on our messaging environment as far
as I am concerned causing our help desk to receive more calls about this
both from the sender (confused because they never typed this in) or the
recipient wondering if they should "keep" the message or not.  I do see more
and more law firms and government agencies that we deal with that attach
these disclaimers which is why we started doing it in the first place -
monkey see, monkey do.

 

Brian

________________________________

From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 12:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Legal Question

 

Does anyone know if the disclaimer like the one below are actually legally
binding on anyone? And if the answer is yes, has it ever really been tested
in court? You don't have to agree to anything to read the email, you just
look and by the point you see the disclaimer, it is too late, you have
picked up the information in the note. The fact that you don't necessarily
agree to it I think would mean you could forward it as you wish unless you
worked for the company who stuck the disclaimer on the note in the first
place. I think telling me I have to delete it if it doesn't pertain to me is
like telling me I have to close my ears and forget anything I hear if a
neighbor says something within my range and then says it can't be disclosed.

 

  joe

 

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stockbrugger, Brian
L.
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Creating user accounts, home folders and assigning
permissions to user and groups

I need to create about 3400 user accounts, create home folders and assign
the appropriate user and group permissions to the home drives automagically.
We are using Windows Server 2003 and AD with a single domain.

 

I know how to create the user accounts and home folders but not sure the
best approach to assign the permissions.  Any suggestions on doing all three
or at least the permissions part.

 

Thanks - Brian

 

 

CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DISCLAIMER: 

This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages
attached to it constitute an electronic communication within the scope of
the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication
may contain non-public, confidential, or legally privileged information
intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful
interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited
under 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. 

 



CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DISCLAIMER: 

This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages
attached to it constitute an electronic communication within the scope of
the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510. This communication
may contain non-public, confidential, or legally privileged information
intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). The unlawful
interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited
under 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. 



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DISCLAIMER: 
This communication and any documents, files, or previous e-mail messages
attached to it constitute an electronic communication within the scope of
the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 USCA 2510.  This communication
may contain non-public, confidential, or legally privileged information
intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s).  The unlawful
interception, use or disclosure of such information is strictly prohibited
under 18 USCA 2511 and any applicable laws. 


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to