|
Hi, I could not agree more with Guido! The
security aspect is the most important reason to go for the suggested solution. However,
there's one thing to keep in mind in this scenario namely the
trustworthiness of your network. If you're not placing a DC in the remote
location, network connectivity becomes a must to enable a user to do his/her
work. Sure, there's a thing as cached credentials on a client, but logon
on to a domain is important for a lot of services. Cheers! John Reijnders (soon to change his e-mail
address into a MSFT one) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Grillenmeier, Guido definitely give them an OU and I'd also
urgently suggest you don't make the machine in that remote office a DC at all => first of all it's not required for
15 folks - you'll need it for other things such as file/print (they should easily
be able to authenticate to your main office; assuming NW connectivity - which
you'd also need to setup replication...) => secondly, it's much more secure,
as you will likely not have much physical security in an office of 15 people
and if you're using the one box for everything it's unsecure from a delegation
perspective /Guido From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Kraus Hi, we are setting up a remote office if about 15 people that
will be linked by a vpn. we are buying new servers that have win2003 on them. I have a coupe of questions,I hope you would indulge me
with your opinions. 1: we are planning to upgrade our headquarters the 2003 in
about 3 -4 months. can we setup the new server with 2003 as domain
controllers so we won't have to upgrade them later ? if so anything special we need to do
? IE: forest prep ? 2: We have a raging debate weather to
set them up as a domain or a org unit in their own site. we have a part
time adiminstrator there htat we need to give right to for day to day
admin work. thanks for your help. Jeff Kraus Network Manger NIC Holding Corp. Voice: 631.753.4272 Fax: 631.753.4305 This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. |
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in windo... John Reijnders
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Jeff Kraus
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Grillenmeier, Guido
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Grillenmeier, Guido
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Jeff Kraus
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Travis Robinson
- RE: [ActiveDir] new 2003 domain controller in ... Grillenmeier, Guido
