True. But, the specific reference I used was for Dr. Who's companion, which
makes somewhat more sense in the context of discussions concerning time, as
time (travel, specifically) was Dr. Who's thing.

--------
Roger Seielstad
E-mail Geek & MS-MVP  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 2:08 AM
> To: '[email protected]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix (OT)
> 
> K9 was also the name of Marvin's dog 
> (http://www.gargaro.com/marvin.html) and he (the dog) 
> appeared in a cartoon in 1948. That pre-dates even Dr Who, I 
> believe :)
> 
> neil
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Roger Seielstad
> Sent: 20 February 2005 20:33
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix
> 
> 
> Actually, K9 was the name of Dr. Who's mechanical dog.
> http://freespace.virgin.net/steve.preston/K9.html
> 
> 
> I was thinking of the time sync app of the same name - which 
> was named for that character. http://www.kaska.demon.co.uk/k9.htm
> 
> Charlie - for reference, I put Tardis (same link) on the PDC 
> in the Harbinger domain back in the NT4 days.
> 
> --------
> Roger Seielstad
> E-mail Geek & MS-MVP  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Ken Cornetet
> > Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 5:39 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix
> > 
> > Marvin the Martian's dog?
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger 
> > Seielstad
> > Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:50 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix
> > 
> > You could also grab a copy of K9 and sync time with it
> > 
> > --------
> > Roger Seielstad
> > E-mail Geek & MS-MVP
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charlie 
> > > Kaiser
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:01 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix
> > > 
> > > Maybe try what we did; set the AD time source to be a
> > router or switch
> > > that can act as a time server. That router or switch then
> > connects to
> > > an external time source. Different flavors of time synch can then 
> > > connect to that router or switch and get time... That 
> way, you also 
> > > don't have to have a connection open on the time ports into
> > your DC...
> > > 
> > > **********************
> > > Charlie Kaiser
> > > MCSE, CCNA
> > > Systems Engineer
> > > Essex Credit / Brickwalk
> > > 510 595 5083
> > > **********************
> > >  
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > > Creamer, Mark
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 10:51 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: [ActiveDir] W32Time and *nix
> > > > 
> > > > Folks, I'd like to throw this back out for comments if I can.
> > > > A while back I asked about using our current W32Time 
> server, the 
> > > > forest root AD box, as the
> > > authoritative
> > > > time server for the non-Windows clients on our network. I
> > > haven't had
> > > > any luck getting this to work. If I remember correctly,
> > > W32Time is a
> > > > derivation of the NTP protocol, (is it SNTP maybe??). Anyway, 
> > > > nothing I've tried enables the Linux and Unix
> > boxes to sync
> > > > with this server. One article I read said it will not
> > work, but you
> > > > obviously can't rely on everything posted on the net :-)
> > > > 
> > > > Am I missing something, or do I need to maybe look at a 
> 3rd party 
> > > > solution to handle all of the time services? What are 
> some of you 
> > > > using for this situation? Thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > Mark Creamer
> > > > 
> > > > This e-mail transmission contains information that is
> > > intended to be
> > > > confidential and privileged.  If you receive this e-mail
> > > and you are
> > > > not a named addressee you are hereby notified that you are not 
> > > > authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this 
> > > > communication without the consent of the sender and that
> > > doing so is
> > > > prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please reply to the message 
> > > > immediately by informing the sender that the message was
> > > misdirected.
> > > > After replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any 
> > > > attachments from your computer system.  Your assistance in
> > > correcting
> > > > this error is appreciated.  Thank you.  Cintas Corporation.
> > > > 
> > > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > > List archive:
> > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > > 
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > List archive:
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > 
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> ==============================================================
> ================
> This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. 
> If you received this message in error please delete it and 
> notify us. If this message was misdirected, CSFB does not 
> waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB retains and 
> monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
> Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on 
> CSFB until they are confirmed by us. Message transmission is 
> not guaranteed to be secure.
> ==============================================================
> ================
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to