Good question - and one I've thought about often myself. It would stand to reason though, that there's a "lag" between the time that a virus/explot is "released" and the time it takes Symantec/Microsoft/etc, to release a fix/update for it - especially since many of the AV companies depend on end-users providing data on new viruses to them.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Kern, Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ActiveDir (E-mail)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 8:51 AM
Subject: [ActiveDir] worm/bot issues



Hi all, i have users that keep getting infected with a worm Symantec calls "W32.Spybot.KHO". The thing keeps coming back unless you disable file and print sharing.
The thing I don't understand is that all my clients(winxp) virus defs are up to date and they are all patched. I use SUS and push out patches on a regular basis. I even ran MS baseline security analyzer on the infected boxes and they come up good for up to datedness.
I don't really understand how an up to date patched pc can become infected over and over.
according to Symantec, the holes that this thing exploits, i've had covered awhile ago.
is it possible to be patched and up to date and STILL get infected?
is there anyway out of this quagmire?
thanks
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to