To be fair, Exchange setup requires WINS.  Without it, setup fails.
Outside of that, Exchange requires shortname resolution, but the only answer
to verify that you have shortname resolution is to use WINS/Netbios
resolution. 

Can you run without it?  Yep.  Is it supported?  Not currently.  

Older versions of Outlook require it, but 2003 can use FQDN (which is needed
for remote access situations).  

Short version?  You really should maintain WINS in your Microsoft
environment especially for cases not covered by Exchange.  SQL, SMS, MOM etc
will need it. Legacy apps will depend on it as well.   If you know you only
need shortname resolution and can get away with it, you *could* run
Exchange/AD in a non-WINS environment, but just don't run into any problems
where you need to get support. :)

-ajm

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 10:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WINS

Both Outlook and Exchange are users of NetBIOS name resolution - to wit, in
the general case, WINS.
 
Outlook uses it to determine where to find its Exchange server to connect to
and sometimes for what DC to use (GC information comes from DNS unless
overridden by a registry item). Outlook will normally fall back to DNS
except in some pathological conditions. Documented, but not public I don't
think (my copy is dated during OL 2003 beta testing and it could've changed
since then - I haven't run a network trace like joe probably has).
 
The easiest thing to note about Exchange is that Exchange servers (take a
look at them in your CN=Servers,CN=<Administrative Group>,CN=Administrative
Groups,CN=<Organization Name>,CN=Microsoft
Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,<domain>) aren't known by a FQDN or DN
or GUID back into the A/D. Do some searching with ADSIedit for yourself on
that topic. :-P Since Exchange is a forest-wide entity, hostnames could be
duplicated in the DNS (note: I didn't say FQDN's - I said hostnames), but
they can't be duplicated in WINS.
              
                -----Original Message-----
                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                To: [email protected]
<[email protected]>
                Sent: Sun Mar 06 12:55:30 2005
                Subject: [ActiveDir] WINS
              
                Is WINS still needed for exchange 2003? Some have said
outlook still needs
                WINS.
              
                List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
                List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
                List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to