|
...
forgot to mention that any number of rollbacks within the available timeframe
takes (in our configuration) only minutes (the most costly demand on the time to
return-to-ready state is the OS's bootstrap).
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:59 PM To: Send - AD mailing list Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recommendations I've
seen a slew of production and lab scenario requests over the past year or so,
many of which I've offered non-technology specific recommendations for ... more
recently I've focused my efforts on a non-Microsoft solution that I developed
for MSEtechnology, used for some time in the Remote Learning
arena, named ECbox (originally defined as "Electronic Classroom in a Box"
though more recently internally-colloquially known as "Enterprise Computing
in a Box").
The
solution was designed from its inception to provide a means of snapshotting a
distributed environment whose services impose a potential requirement to
roll-back the entire distributed implementation to an earlier point in time
(lock, stock and, hopefully not too-smoking, barrel). As I mentioned, the
ECbox is used extensively for remote learning but MSEtechnology has also
deployed it as a platform around which our own internal technology services are
housed.
Simply
put, the ECbox is a solution built upon VMware ESX Server containing server (and
administrative client-side mods.) designed specifically to tailor ESX's
feature set to the demands of collective groups of dependent
computers (e.g. a distributed database such as Active Directory). For
the sake of example, MSEtechnology is able to roll its entire Directory,
Web and Messaging service (though our requirements are comparatively small,
the scale is something of an irrelevant factor in rollback capability and time)
back to a multitude of daily earlier points in time (MSEtechnology's current
capacity/requirement allows for a couple of weeks).
Hope
this proves useful.
Regards.
Dean
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard, Aric Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 8:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recommendations How about MSVS 2005,
MSVPC 2004, or VMWare (pick your flavor) with undo disks? From my experience
this a lot faster and typically cheaper than using a disk imaging utility and a
slew of physical machines. Regards, Aric From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
- Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recommendation... Dean Wells
- Re: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recommend... James_Day
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recommend... Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recommend... Bernard, Aric
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recom... Dean Wells
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab Recom... Alain Lissoir
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab R... Alain Lissoir
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory L... Dean Wells
- RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory Lab R... Mark Parris
