From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Wed 3/23/2005 5:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT Question - Exchange DL based but still has an AD portion...
I say it because some of the DLs I'm on, people would find out
they
didn't get the message. Such as a required form that they would not
fill
out.
Did I call all 4000 people on one of these lists? No I
didn't.
Short of having a script that watches every mailbox, I suspect no one
on
this list can really answer that
question.
~Eric
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 4:48 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT
Question - Exchange DL
based but still has an AD portion...
How do you
know it works just fine? What proactive checking is done to
verify it? Say 2
people didn't get the message and they didn't realize
there
was a message
to not get...
The question is being posed because I am working with some
folks who had
a
couple of people (that we know of) out of several thousand
that got one
message posted to a DL but didn't get an important followup
message. It
is
slowly being reduced to either the expansion is screwed on
the Exchange
side
or on the AD side and my bet is Exchange side as I don't
expect AD would
not
return all users in a group without throwing at least
one error. We know
that it isn't a user issue because there is no evidence in
the tracking
logs
of the message ever going to those people. Right now I
am trying to get
a
comprehensive list of everyone who did get sent a
message so it can be
compared to the DL itself to see if it was just these
two people or
more.
joe
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 7:41 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT
Question - Exchange DL
based
but still has an AD portion...
I'm on
several DLs that are thousands of users in size(some are multiple
times
larger than MaxValRange), and it works just fine. (by thousands of
users in
size, I'm talking about a single DL that is thousands of users,
not
nested
DLs, as that is of course an entirely different test scenario
that
may not
hit ranged retrieval)
Why do you ask? Is there a followup technical
question? :)
~Eric
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:04 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Another Odd OT
Question - Exchange DL based
but
still has an AD portion...
Has
anyone ever actually tested if Exchange properly delivers emails
to
all
members of a large (many thousands of mail objects) Distribution
List?
Specifically where the Exchange server has to expand a DL and
use
attribute
ranging to get all members.
joe
List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List
info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List
FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List
archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
