RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP NTLM Authed Channel Encryption Question was LDAPS part 2

[joe]

Title: Message

I don't think so for this thread...   :o) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Myrick, Todd (NIH/CC/DNA) Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 11:24 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP NTLM Authed Channel Encryption Question was LDAPS part 2 IS Spam Filtering a possible cause?   Todd   From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:39 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP NTLM Authed Channel Encryption Question was LDAPS part 2   That is exactly what I was thinking. I bounced it off Eric but he hasn't had a chance to look at it yet.     joe   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:13 AM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP NTLM Authed Channel Encryption Question was LDAPS part 2 Doesn’t that smell like a bug or something?  This doesn’t seem to be the documented behavior.   Eric? J   We could bounce this off the SDK team too as they are responsible for the code.   Joe K.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:29 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] LDAP NTLM Authed Channel Encryption Question was LDAPS part 2   No encrypt specified, in fact I can specifically set it to off (0) and it still encrypts. I can not get it to do anything clear text once it hits and succeeds the SASL NTLM bind.     joe This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.