Hi Neil,

Presuming the clients somehow have access to DNS (preferred or alternate)
they will first try to reach the DCs in their own site (site A). As all DCs
are down in site A the clients then will ask for all DCs in the domain that
have registered the domain specific DNS records.

For more info on this see:
* http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Print.cfm?ArticleID=37935
Authentication Topology by Gil Kirkpatrick
* http://www.windowsitpro.com/Windows/Article/ArticleID/40718/40718.html
Designing for DC Failover by Sean Deuby 

Autositecoverage only works for DC-less sites. So yes, it behaves
differently for situation 1 (autositecoverage will occur) and 2 (no
autositecoverage will occur)

Cheers
Jorge

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
Sent: dinsdag 29 maart 2005 11:56
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Site Confusion

Thanks Jorge.

Are you implying that the answer to the original question is therefore 'no'?
This has huge ramifications in the branch office. Or did I simply explain
how the answer is 'yes', but for the wrong reasons??

Are you also saying that DCs (and sitecoverage) handle the following 2
scenarios in different ways:
1. No DCs installed in some site
2. DCs installed in some site but non available

Can you expand on your previous post please?

Thanks,
neil


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de Almeida
Pinto
Sent: 29 March 2005 10:21
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Site Confusion


I think that's incorrect if you're talking about autositecoverage.
Autositecoverage by DCs from some domain for some site will only occur if
some site has no DCs from that same domain. Although DCs are down and not
available, the DCs in other sites in the same domain see in their own
replica that that site has DCs and autositecoverage will occur. Sitecoverage
will occur by other DCs if you configured it manually through the registry
or a GPO

Cheers,
Jorge

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 09:25
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] AD Site Confusion

Depending upon your site links, DCs in either site B or C will advertise
themselves as available to site A. The DCs in the site with lowest cost to
site A will perform this role.

What do you mean by 'take down'? Are you taking a WAN link down or powering
off the DCs or demoting them or what?

neil


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Brown
Sent: 28 March 2005 21:55
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] AD Site Confusion


I have 3 sites, site A has 2 DC's and site B & C each have 1 DC.

When I take down site A (both DC's), the clients in Site A cannot log in.
Shouldn't they be able to log in using site B or C?

Thanks,
--
Matt Brown
Information Technology System Specialist Eastern Washington University



List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

============================================================================
==
This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
============================================================================
==

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

============================================================================
==
This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
============================================================================
==

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to