Slightly off-topic...but I am trying to clarify the user account
required to authorize a DHCP server.  Does this need to be an Enterprise
Admin, or a Domain Admin?

Regards,

Tim 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de
Almeida Pinto
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DHCP on a DC

Hi,

This is for any DNS resource record! (when DHCP is installed on a DC and
no
user credentials are used)

A DC by default belongs to the computed group called ENTERPRISE DOMAIN
CONTROLLERS. That same group has ALL THE POWER over ALL DNS records when
AD
Integrated zones are used. When DHCP is installed on a DC it "inherits"
the
power from the DC and thus the DHCP can do anything with any DNS record.
As
you may know the DNS records of the DCs (e.g. all kinds of service
records)
are very important for the functioning of AD

Logically a member server DOES NOT belong to the computed group called
ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS. When DHCP is installed on a member server
it
"inherits" the power from the member server and thus the DHCP can't do
much.
It only has the power over those records it has registered on behalf of
the
clients.

When DHCP is installed on a DC and to mitigate the risk that the DHCP
SERVICE has power over DC records and other records that it does not
own,
DHCP can be configured to use an user account when doing registrations
on
behalf of the client computers
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255134) (in W2K
use
NETSH and in W2K3 use NETSH or the DHCP GUI)

The following situations are also interesting:
(1) Multiple DHCP servers at one location providing IP addresses and
registering those addresses on behalf of those clients
(2) Clients moving between different locations

In both situations multiple DHCP servers need to be able to
register/update
the DNS record of the clients. If DHCP is installed on a DC there is no
problem as DHCP inherits its rights through the DC role. If DHCP is
installed on member servers the DHCP server that registers some record
on
behalf of the client automatically becomes the owner of that record
(i.e.
has permissions for that record to modify it!). If another DHCP needs
(because of one of the situations mentioned above) to register/update
the
same record it is not allowed to do that and the record can therefore
not be
updated. A solution (not recommended!) for this is to make the DHCP
server a
member of the group DNSUpdateProxy. In this situation all DNS records
registered by the DHCP server that is a member of that group are
"owner-less", meaning that EVERYONE can update/register those records
and
become the owner! Imagine this one on a DC!!! -> DON'T DO THAT!!!
Even on a member server I don't recommend that, in some situations it
might
be needed, although I can't think of one right now.

If more than one DHCP server, regardless if it is installed on a DC or a
member server, needs to update the same records, configure DHCP to use
the
credentials of some user account
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255134) (in W2K
use
NETSH and in W2K3 use NETSH or the DHCP GUI)
If DHCP is installed on a DC, configure DHCP to use the credentials of
some
user account
(http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;255134) (in W2K
use
NETSH and in W2K3 use NETSH or the DHCP GUI)

I hope this helps you understand the situations

Cheers
Jorge 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 17:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DHCP on a DC

Tom,

Thank you for responding.  Do you really mean "any record"?  So it could
just decide to delete the Domain Controllers OU?  Or do you mean any
record
in DNS, which is where I would expect it to operate?  I simply can't
understand why (logically) a DC would not be the optimum place for this.
A
proxy agent (member server) is still going to have and require the
requisite
authority to update records so where is the security vulnerability?  I
didn't mention that this is happening on W2K3 server.  Does this
vulnerability still apply?

Thanks

RH
___________________________________________




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DHCP on a DC


You can install it on a DC but its not recommended.
When you install a dhcp server on a DC it runs in the security context
of
the DC. Every DC has full control over all the zones and records in AD.
So
by proxy, so does the dhcp service running on a DC. This means it can
delete
or modify any record in AD,including those created by domain memebers
and
DC's.

Thats a lot of power and potential for abuse and screw ups in dns and
consquently, your AD forest.
If you do run it on a DC, I think MS recommends you create a seperate
dedicated account for the dhcp service to run under using netsh.exe



Rocky Habeeb wrote:
> People,
>
> Please consider helping me with this question.  We are getting ready 
> to switch to DHCP.  Reading a document from MSDN entitled "Chapter 2 
> Deploying DHCP" there is a section that states "If DHCP will perform 
> DNS dynamic updates, do not install it on a domain controller.
> Instead, install DHCP on a member server.  When DHCP is installed on a

> DC and is configured to perform dynamic updates on behalf of clients 
> in DNS zones that are configured to allow only secure dynamic update, 
> specify a user account to update the DNS records."
>
> Well, this statement is ambiguous.  Can it be installed on a DC (which

> we would prefer to do for reasons of economy) or not?  Is there a 
> problem with doing it?
>
> Thank you people in advance.
>
> RH
>
> _____________________________
>
> Rocky Habeeb
> Microsoft Systems Administrator
> James W. Sewall Company
> Old Town, Maine
> Voice: 207.827.4456  Ext. 387
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.jws.com
> _____________________________
>
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/




List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are
not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and
any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to