|
I was only able to get Microsoft’s
attention last year because I had originally contacted Russ Cooper and of
course he has good contacts with the security team there. I’ll have to
dig through my mail archive to find out who it was that took the case from the
security team. Deji, if you want I will provide you
details off-list so you can know exactly what I’m talking about. Regards, Lou From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK, this is news – to me. Do you
want it chased, or are you in a position to get a direct MS opinion on it
yourself? Since ~Eric has chimed in, I think we should hand it off to him J Deji From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lou Vega All in all, not an earth shattering bug,
but still something that in my opinion really needs to be fixed. Since I told Microsoft Security I
wouldn’t release details on this bug until they had a chance to fix it, I
won’t go into the details here. However, since it has been since May 2004
and they apparently have not addressed it in the current SP, I’ll say
this….Basically it was a bug where you could effectively disable the
Restricted Groups feature of Group Policy allowing anyone to remain in the
group even if it was listed as Restricted. As an added bonus, the OS
doesn’t even generate any event log entries…all Security Policy
refreshes are listed with no problems in the event log. It’s not remotely
exploitable or anything like that; just something that I really felt should be
addressed. Regards, Lou From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lou, what security fix are you asking about? I am in Security, and
I’ve been doing SP1 for a while now, so I may be able to respond in less
that 11 words ;) Or, I may be able to chase it up for you. Deji -----Original Message----- FWIW - I just installed it on a test server (domain controller for a
"play network") and it appears fine at the moment. If there are any
Microsoft Security Team folks on board listening, I'm personally curious to see
if a particular fix has been added to this SP since I was told it would be
when I reported a problem last May. Upon the initial install of the SP, it
would appear as if it were not fixed. r/ Lou -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave A.
Marquis Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:37 AM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM I am certainly going to be waiting to install this one for a while........ to many changes to jump right into it. David A. Marquis Computer Systems Administrator List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ |
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Lou Vega
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Dave A. Marquis
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Ken Schaefer
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Roger Seielstad
- RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Roger Seielstad
- Re: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Tomasz Onyszko
- Re: [ActiveDir] 2003 SP1 RTM Steve Patrick
