If it helps, here is how each CSE responds, by default, when a slow link
is detected:

 CSE                                    Processes on Slow Link?

Security                                        Yes
IP Security                                     Yes
EFS Recovery                            Yes
Wireless Network                                Yes
Administrative Templates                Yes
Scripts                                 No
Folder Redirection                      No
Software Installation                   No
IE Maintenance                          Yes

So if desktop lockdown = administrative templates, you should not be
experiencing problems because of the slow link. However, is ICMP enabled
between these remote sites and their DCs? If not, then slow link
detection will break and no GP processing will occur. That could be what
you're seeing. The answer then is to disable slow link detection
completely (or enable ICMP).

Darren



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hines
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 6:53 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] GPO's not getting there

What do you mean by "GPO's aren't applied properly on the workstations"?
Are you using slow WAN link detection settings for GPO's?  That would
cause the clients to not process all GPO settings .  Even in that
scenario the majority of GP Settings apply except for those that are
bandwidth intensive.
Those would be settings such as folder redirection, logon scripts and
application deployment.  You should still receive security settings and
the settings from administrative templates.

Tim


----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas Blank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 9:27 AM
Subject: [ActiveDir] GPO's not getting there


> I have a customer with small links and 1200+ wan sites. Problem I'm
having
> is that without local DC's GPO's aren't applied properly on the
workstations
> on logon, and the workstations are not locked down. The customer is
not
> willing to buy an extra 1200 dc's. Since WAN costs are a bit silly the
size
> of our pipes seem to be fixed as well. I don't really know how to get
around
> this without tatooing the registry for the currently loggon on user,
but
> that wouldn't give me the flexibility needed to achieve complete
lockdown
> either.
> Any ideas around this?
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to