|
> AD DNS is built-in /
Active Directory integrated and Lucent is an external system -
Is this a pro or a con in your
eyes?
> also if you lose communications with
your Lucent QIP systems, people could have severe login problems...
This
is not really a DNS solution-specific issue. This is a Microsoft AD Domain
issue.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS AD DNS is built-in / Active Directory integrated and Lucent is an external
system -
Use AD's DNS if possible; also if you lose communications with your Lucent
QIP systems, people could have severe login problems...
Chuck Gafford
Unisys
Architect 2
|
- RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS joe
