forgot to mention

As I know of AD aware backup programs trigger a restored DC to:
* Generate a new invocation id for the AD db
* Throw away the current rid pool and ask for a new one at the rid master
* Puts the current SYSVOL contents asside and "regenerates" new content for
the SYSVOL using inbound partners if these have new data or use the data
that has been put asside on the restored DC if some of the data on the
inbound partner has not changed
* anything else....???
As I know of imaging tools don't that

#JORGE#

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'joe '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ';
'[email protected] '
Sent: 5/6/2005 12:16 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] best practice?

Imaging works great (for stand alone servers), but you'll have to be
carefull with the additional services installed on the server. Joe
already
mentioned IIS. Another service that "remembers" the old computer name is
DNS, even if it is only installed and not configured! In my test
(virtual)
environment I still see the old computername in SOA and NS records.
After
doing some "repairs" everything works great again.
Another one I experienced in my VM test environment was when I had a VM
configured with w2k3 server, cloned that installation, used ghostwalker
to
change the name and SID, and after that tried to configure NLB. It kept
telling me the second NIC was already listed and that it could not be
used
again. And I only had configured the first NIC into the NLB config. The
problem here was that the HW was not PnPed and because of that the NIC
on
both servers had the same GUID (look into
HKLM\SYSTEM\CURRENTCONTROLSET\SERVICES\<GUID>) After removing the NIC in
Device manager and scanning for HW changes the NIC got a new GUID and it
worked after that. There could be more of these hidden things

In my opinion to clone servers quick and dirty for test environments you
could use anything, but for production machines I prefer (always) using
SYSPREP (supported and free)

I wonder, how does microsoft look at the different SID changing utils
available? I remember someone telling me that MS only supports SYSPREP
and
it does not support NewSID, Ghostwalker, etc. Is this true?

Cheers
#JORGE#

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 5/5/2005 7:02 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] best practice?

What did you use to change the SID? NewSID? If so it is probably ok for
most uses.
 
I assume you rejoined the domain with the new name?
 
Imaging a member has worked quite well and often in my experience though
you can run into places where it remembers the old name, for instance
like installing IIS and possibly other things. When it generates the IIS
accounts for running the various pieces it tends to recall the old
machine name and usesthat in the names. I expect it is buried in the
meta data somewhere but have never worried enough to go looking for it.
 
That being said, I have never done this in a cluster. I am sure the HP
Engineer was umcomfortable with it simply because he/she didn't have
experience with it and when building a cluster, I would expect the idea
would be to do everything in well known ways considering the reasoning
for building clusters in the first place. 
 
 
 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Jessop
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] best practice?


When I was installing two servers in a cluster (member servers) I simply
installed the os in one on mirrored disks, took out one of the disks and
put it in the second server. Regenerated the two mirros, changed the
name and SID on the second one and then installed the cluster service on
both. It hasn't given any problems but at the time the HP engineer
didn't like it but gave me no concrete reason. Is this practise OK and
are imaging techniques just issues with DCs?

Peter Jessop


This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are
not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and
any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to