I did not mean to say that LDAP is a auth. protocol. No way, it's a
directory access protocol! (no hard feelings either in any way!)(however,
sometimes I hear people talking about LDAP authentication and then I try to
explain that LDAP is the dir access protocol and that kerberos or NTLM is
the auth protocol. After that sometimes they still keep talking about the
"LDAP authenticating protocol" and I think "whatever!").
I even rephrased it in another mail (see below beneath your post) that _ldap
and _kerberos is used. I did a network trace for a "client join", "a
workstation boot and user logon" and a "user password change". I will post
my findings on monday as I have them on my laptop and I'm using webmail
right now from another computer. I will even send the capture files if I
don't forget to add them so everyone can see if interested.

Cheers
#JORGE#

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 5/8/2005 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File

Of course LDAP is going to be used, as there needs to be a protocol that
knows how to find the authenticating DC.

However, not to confuse any issues here - LDAP is not and authenticating
protocol in any way, shape or form.  

Jorge, just want to be sure that you know that I know you weren't
insinuating LADP had anything to do with authN, either.  Merely
clarifying
the point.

-rtk


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jorge de
Almeida
Pinto
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 7:24 PM
To: 'joe '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ';
'[email protected] '
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File

Darren has written a great article on AD network interactions
(http://www.windowsitpro.com/Article/ArticleID/37928/37928.html)

Both _ldap and _kerberos are used during authentication

#JORGE#

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: 5/6/2005 2:12 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File

I believe Jorge is correct.

If I recall correctly, the last time I did a complete trace from boot to
log
on of a K3 Server the only SRV record looked up at any point in that
process
was the _ldap._tcp.<site>._sites.<domain> record.

However, I can't count out that some caching from previous boots wasn't
being used by the server when it started. The full proof way I guess of
testing this would be to take a raw fresh box and trace it on startup
through the join process and then reboot and log on to see if the
kerberos
record is ever queried. 

However, in all of the traces I have done, I don't think I ever recall
seeing a query for the _kerberos records....

Does MS DNS have the capability to keep easy statistics on what records
are
queried and how often?


   joe

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 7:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File

I thought for auth purposes, it was _kerberos.tcp.<site>. etc,etc...? 

Am I wrong?
Thanks
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld (www.BlackBerry.net)

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied,
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an
intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any
attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to