I'm just fascinated by it.  In fact the one time I did briefly meet RickD, I 
was thoroughly impressed by him.  I think he's quite capable at whatever he 
decides to do and I'm sure that Microsoft offers opportunities to people from 
within that have not necessarily been there and done that but rather are 
otherwise a fit for the job.  Seems to work better if you ask me. 

We'd probably be better off to kill this thread before Tony gives one of us a 
thump for taking the list off track. 

Al 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All - OT (and drifting further away)

Honestly, I found it a bit of a surprise as well.  However, there must be 
something in his background or his talents that lend him to that end.

-rtk
        
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 3:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All - OT (and drifting further away)

Interesting that RickD is now in charge of services.  I find that infinitely 
fascinating.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 3:31 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All - OT (and drifting further away)

Interesting timing on this article -
http://searchwin2000.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid1_gci1065731
,00.html?track=NL-118&ad=513593


I see what you are saying with MS and the hardware and other networking 
components. If MS was truly serious in this area, they would have to be able to 
step a little more into those areas as well and I am sure really tick some 
people off. I know quite a few MCS guys though that have sat down and helped 
configure firewalls and UNIX DNS servers to make things work though too. I 
doubt it is anything MS taught them versus knowing it on their own.
But then you always have that problem with consultants, it is what the 
consultant knows, not what the company has taught them. If you have to depend 
on what the consulting company teaches the consultant, admit you are screwed 
right up front.

On the plus side, as long as that services/consulting group got a better voice 
into the MS product line[1], this could seriously help MS in the real world 
versus the theoretical best of all worlds world that a lot of stuff seems to be 
made for. 

  joe



[1] I would assume this would happen if this group became a solid consistent 
high paying revenue stream.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 2:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All - OT (and drifting further away)

I, more than many, would really appreciate Microsoft building up its consulting 
ranks/headcount ;)  

Until then, I don't think they can be considered as a serious player in the 
consulting arena.  I think they will never (by virtue of their culture) be able 
to be a consulting organization that deals with end to end consulting; they 
can't deal with hardware without really making other vendors/partners irate for 
example.  Same goes for software that Microsoft doesn't make, networking 
equipment/OS, etc. 

Compuware?  I suppose they could since they claim to deal with 90% of the 
fortunate 100.  

Question to ask is how they get on the top 5 list.  Is it by revenue?
Profits?  Headcount? Did they make the list themselves?  ??




 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All

I keep hearing rumours that MS is really going to be kicking its presence up in 
consulting and services by adding thousands (or tens of thousands) of analysts 
for it. 

Oh and I thought of another possible one though I don't know how big they are 
anymore... Compuware.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All

Accenture?  Compucom? CSC?

I don't think MS would rank that high in the consulting arena.  


What's a Cv?  Pardon my ignorance, but that has me puzzled.  I mean, before 
Tony comes back online I'd like to know. :)

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 12:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] All

Unless you got clearance from Tony to post this prepare to be thumped. 



As an aside, who are the largest 5 IT specific companies now?

IBM, HP, Dell??, MS, Lockheed, Unisys, ??



    joe

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Cooper
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 11:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] All
Importance: High

Dear All,

I am currently conducting a search for one of the top 5 largest IT companies in 
the world. They are looking for a number of  Architects of varying levels from 
Junior to Guru level. You will gain exposure to the worlds largest programmes 
and Technical environments.

You should have excellent MS Environment experience, in particular Active 
Directory. The client has numerous regional offices across the UK so location 
not a problem. Salaries range from �40k to �105k base salary with up to 40% 
bonuses.

Please email your Cv or contact me if of interest.

Simon Cooper
IT Connect UK Ltd
5 Hampton Hill Business Park,
High Street,
Hampton Hill,
Middlesex,
TW12  1NP
Tel  Number +44 208 973 33 33
Fax Number +44 208 973 32 00
Mobile +44 7952 672 739
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.itconnect.co.uk


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to