Can't be SP3. I stopped messing with 2K in SP3 and the Island thing was still
there. I wasn't even aware that SP4 fixed the issue, but I haven't worked
much on an SP4 environment to know for sure.
 
 
Sincerely,

D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Wed 5/11/2005 10:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS



Details, details.....

However, I think that it was actually fixed is SP3, no?

;o)

-rtk

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Santhosh Sivarajan
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

Hmm..it is not "completely" true in Windows 2000 either because Island
problem fixed in Windows 2000 SP4. :- )

Santhosh

Santhosh Sivarajan
MCSE(W2K3/W2K/NT4),MCSA(W2K3/W2K/MSG),CCNA,Network+
Houston, TX


On 5/11/05, Kingslan, Rick T. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right you are.  I actually meant it to be intended for Windows 2000 - but
upon rereading - I see where that could be misconstrued.
>
> And, yes - they did very nicely fix the islanding problem with the
ForestDns entries.  Works out quite nicely, yes?
>
> -rtk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:50 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS
> >
> > I see that the absence of that critical smiley tripped you. Here :) :)
> >
> > OK, now that we've got that out of the way, here's what I was trying to
> > say
> > in a round-about way. DNS Islanding is a W2K issue. If my reading
> > materials
> > and readings glasses are good, then this problem does not afflict W2K3.
> > So,
> > when you said "True for Windows 2000 well", I thought it should be
> > rephrased
> > as "It only applies to Windows 2000, and not Window 2003".
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
> > Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> > www.readymaids.com - we know IT
> > www.akomolafe.com
> > Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
> > Yesterday?  -anon
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kingslan, Rick T.
> > Sent: Wed 5/11/2005 1:26 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS
> >
> >
> >
> > More appropriately, please interpret because I've obviously read
Debbie's
> > request wrong.
> >
> > -rtk
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:43 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS
> > >
> > > <RTK, aka Rick T(for Trouble) Kingslan, sat down in his high chair and
> > > bellowed as follows:>
> > > >>> True for Windows 2000 as well
> > >
> > > To which I trembled and exclaimed:
> > >
> > > Don't you mean: True for Windows 2000, but not for Windows 2003? My
> > cheat
> > > sheets say that's what you meant. Maybe they need updating.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > D�j� Ak�m�l�f�, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
> > > Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> > > www.readymaids.com - we know IT
> > > www.akomolafe.com
> > > Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
> > > Yesterday?  -anon
> > >
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > > List archive: http://www.mail-
> > archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> >
> >
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to