Additionally, if it were me and if you've not done so already, I'd
disable all of those unused accounts while I was counting.  (oldcmp does
this as well, no?)

Many unused accounts + at least one or two that have probably never
changed from some default (or blank) password = monstrous attack vector
waiting to happen.

(I'm big on the equations today for some reason.)

- Laura

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Creamer, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 4:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Determining active user accounts
> 
> Thanks Laura, good suggestion. I forgot I could use oldcmp 
> for users as well. Great tool, Joe.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> <mc>
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Hunter, Laura E.
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 3:56 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Determining active user accounts
> 
> Wouldn't the accounts that don't need server access show up 
> as inactive
> if you ran them through joe's 'oldcmp'?  If so, then couldn't 
> you get a
> fair approximation from:
> 
> CALs required = [Total user objects] - [user objects flagged 
> by oldcmp]
> 
> ?
> 
> [Insert standard "Call your reseller for definitive licensing advice"
> disclaimer here.]
> 
> - Laura
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Creamer, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 3:40 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] Determining active user accounts
> > 
> > We need to get a count of users that are active, so we can 
> > make sure our purchasing of 2003 User CALs is as accurate as 
> > possible. However, every employee of the company has an 
> > account in Active Directory, but only a certain percentage of 
> > those users ever access a server or need to authenticate. 
> > What's the best way to determine how many users we need to 
> > have a User CAL for?
> > 
> > Mark Creamer
> > 
> > Systems Engineer
> > 
> > Cintas Corporation
> > 
> > 
> > This e-mail transmission contains information that is 
> > intended to be confidential and privileged. If you receive 
> > this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby 
> > notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, 
> > copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of 
> > the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be 
> > unlawful. Please reply to the message immediately by 
> > informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After 
> > replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any 
> > attachments from your computer system. Your assistance in 
> > correcting this error is appreciated.
> > 
> > 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> This e-mail transmission contains information that is 
> intended to be confidential and privileged.  If you receive 
> this e-mail and you are not a named addressee you are hereby 
> notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain, 
> copy or disseminate this communication without the consent of 
> the sender and that doing so is prohibited and may be 
> unlawful.  Please reply to the message immediately by 
> informing the sender that the message was misdirected.  After 
> replying, please delete and otherwise erase it and any 
> attachments from your computer system.  Your assistance in 
> correcting this error is appreciated.
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to