Title: Message
Yup, we've done it.  Before 1.8 it does require a schema mod.  What you get are two different "custom" objects for the iLO cards that look pretty much like a quick-and-dirty mod of a standard user object.  (Emphasis on dirty: they look like user objects to a couple of our reporting scripts.)
 
Raymond's comment below cover what I know of the 1.8 version.
 

Al Maurer
Service Manager, Naming and Authentication Services
IT | Information Technology
Agilent Technologies
(719) 590-2639; Telnet 590-2639
http://activedirectory.it.agilent.com
----------------------------------------------
A good plan today is better than a perfect plan tomorrow.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Rascher, Raymond
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:37 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RILOE AD Integration

I understand that the schema less ILO's are limited in functionality opposed to the ILO w/schema extensions. Ex. Specify a group used for administration and live with it unless you want to touch each ILO and add an additional group vs. Schema ILO it would allow additional groups to be added and removed through AD and you would not need to touch the ILO's once they are joined to the domain.
If you are going to use the ILO schema extensions to integrate ILO's you will also need to have certificates installed on your DC's for them to communicate properly over SSL
 
Ray


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Brad
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 9:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RILOE AD Integration

My understanding is none whatsoever.


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 5:11 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RILOE AD Integration

Does this mean 'no additional schema mods (above and beyond previous versions)' or ' no schema mods at all, even if you have yet to deploy any previous ILO schema mods' ?
 
The latter would certainly be of interest.
 
neil

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Brad
Sent: 15 July 2005 14:54
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RILOE AD Integration

And now for the actual link....
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francis Ouellet
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 1:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] RILOE AD Integration

Hi, I used the ADUC with our iLO setup (~50 servers) a while ago and it was flawless. The schema extensions have not caused any issues at all with any upgrades we had to do (Exchange 2003 forestprep) I highly recommend them.
 
Francis


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: July 5, 2005 8:27 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] RILOE AD Integration

Anybody done the schema extensions to support HPQ iLO/RiLOE II integration with AD. I'm thinking about it. We're pushing out 50 380s with RiLOE II boards in the next four weeks to all over kingdom come.

If you have, how's it work from the ilo standpoint? ADUC extensions work ok?

--brian



This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl



This email and any attached files are confidential and copyright protected. If you are not the addressee, any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing, nothing stated in this communication shall be legally binding.

==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:

http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml

==============================================================================

Reply via email to