About the OU thing, is what you are asking for, that you should basically
be able to make the OU just a normal security group?

-B

On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, WILLIAMS, J.D. wrote:

> I dislike OUs not being able to act as security principals (right
> terminology?) I'd like to assign rights on various objects to OUs as well as
> groups and individuals.
> 
> I second Joe's gripe about branch replication
> 
> JD 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Biggest AD Gripes
> 
> So what are everyone's biggest AD Gripes? I am not talking about gripes
> about things that use AD like GPOs[1] or Exchange or NFS or anything else
> like that. I mean actual AD really missed the boat because of this that or
> the other thing.
> 
> Like 
> 
> o I dislike that when you defunct an attribute it doesn't purge the
> information in the directory for that attribute.
> 
> o The fact that AD Security policy is managed through a technology dependent
> on AD and replicates both within AD and the other technology.
>  
> o I dislike that there is no true schema delete.
> 
> o I dislike the fact that I can't specify which branches of the tree
> replicate where.
> 
> o I dislike the fact that GUIDs are represented in multiple ways in the
> directory.
> 
> o I dislike the implementation of property sets especially since they could
> be so incredible awesomely cool. Specifically I dislike that an attribute
> can only be in a single property set. 
> 
> o I dislike creator/owner on SDs.
> 
> o I dislike the lack of configurable business rules.
> 
> o I dislike the fact that I can't run multiple domains on a single domain
> controller. 
> 
> 
> 
> Etc etc. I have more but lets see what others say. Everyone pipe up. Let's
> pretend that MS will actually see this, let's further say let's pretend MS
> AD Developers will see this. What would you tell them if you were sitting in
> the room with them?
> 
> 
> 
>    joe
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] I do not consider GPOs to be part of AD. They are a technology that
> leverages AD.
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to