G'morning (still blerry eyes on the west coast and yet to get some coffee)

The OS is Windows 2000 SP4. And, as per Jorge's initial suggestion, I
disabled BASL, and I am still getting the errors. Finally, if I said "no
custom site links", I misspoke. There are three links -- one for each spoke
("- There are three IP site links: Hub-B1, Hub-B2, and Hub-B3").

I think that Jorge and I were just discussing killing the ISTG, not the KCC,
right? And, as I asked yesterday, maybe all this does not matter as
_replication_ is working and we are doing a full redesign and implementation
in the next 6-9 months.

Thanks. Time to get some coffee.

-- nme

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 7:18 AM
> To: Send - AD mailing list
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> 
> As always, I'm late to this thread so I'll chime in with one 
> (hopefully) worthwhile clarification.  The ISTG and the KCC 
> are not the same thing though the ISTG is considered a 
> sub-component of the KCC.  Disabling the KCC is a quite 
> different thing from merely disabling the ISTG.
> 
> May I ask inquire as to the OS version here, I don't believe 
> it's been mentioned as yet (apologies if I missed it).
> 
> --
> Dean Wells
> MSEtechnology
> * Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msetechnology.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Adner
> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 9:49 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> 
> Yeah.  Stop trying to disable the KCC already.  The KCC is 
> your friend.  :) You do, however, want to disable 'bridge all 
> site links' (located under the properties of "Intersite 
> Transports -> IP").  You need to do this because the network 
> is not fully routable due to your VPN tunnels.  With BASL 
> enabled, all site links are treated as transitive, meaning 
> any DC can potentially replicate with any other DC.  Since 
> that's not true in your environment you need to disable BASL.
> 
> ...After reading your response more thoroughly, you mention 
> that you have no "custom site links".  I assume that means 
> you only have the DEFAULTIPSITELINK with all sites in it.  If 
> true, you need to stop that practice, too, as you're 
> effectively creating a full mesh topology.  Since your 
> network isn't a full mesh, that won't work.  You need to 
> create individual site links between each site to form the 
> proper topology.  Don't disable BASL until you've done this.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 4:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> 
> Noah,
> 
> Just my curiosity - what is the reason for disabling (or, wanting to
> disable) the KCC?  It's not a recommended practice unless you 
> have a very large number of links / sites / replication 
> objects (and the number changes to a significantly larger 
> number in Win2k3 Functional), or the topology is such that 
> the KCC and the ISTG is not able to do its job of creating a 
> proper spanning tree - neither of which are very likely.  
> Companies with 200k plus users and 150 sites don't normally 
> run into this problem.
> 
> The normal remedy is to take a look at everything else and 
> eliminate *IT* (meaning everything else) as a potential 
> reason for why the KCC/ISTG isn't working to expectations.  
> Then when everything else has been eliminated, reviewing what 
> the impact will be of killing off the KCC.
> 
> Specifically, the first realization of killing the KCC - all 
> of the replication objects between servers - will have to be 
> manually maintained.
> The ISTG will no longer do it.  In all but the smallest 
> shops, this would likely take most of the time of one very 
> adept admin.
> 
> So - think carefully on this move.  As I said - it's not recommended.
> 
> Rick
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Eiger
> Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 4:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> 
> Thanks, Jorge.
> 
> So the KCC is on at all sites. In my situation, I want to 
> disable the KCC. A few questions:
> - Is the command to do so: 
> repadmin /siteoptions branch1dc.company.com /site:branch1
> +IS_INTER_SITE_AUTO_TOPOLOGY_DISABLED
> - Do I have to run this against each DC?
> - I believe I only want to disable the INTER_SITE, not the 
> INTRA_SITE, right?
> - Do I think need to manually create the connection objects 
> or can I just leave the auto generated ones in place?
> - Does all this change if the VPN topology allows for a fully 
> routed network?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- nme
> 
> P.S. I checked the questions you asked. DCs and GCs are 
> correct; no custom site links or connections; site membership 
> is correct.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 11:59 AM
> > To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> > 
> > I expected that.. in a few words hub-and-spoke topology in 
> a non fully 
> > routed network. For this to work you need a site for each 
> location and 
> > a site link between each spoke (the
> > bracnhes) and the hub and auto site link bridging is off
> >  
> > The other thing I can think of:
> > * Is each DC/GC in the correct site?
> > * Do you have custom site link bridges?
> > * Do you have custom connections (auto connections are visible as 
> > automatic connections and custom connections are visible as GUIDs)
> > * Check the site membership of the site links. Is it correct
> > * Other site links connecting the branches somehow
> > * etc
> >  
> > By the way. To see if the KCC/ISTG for a site has been 
> disabled open 
> > up the properties of the NTDS Site Settings object of each site. If 
> > you see yellow exclamation marks at the bottom with text explaining 
> > it, the KCC is disabled. If you don't see anything it is enabled
> >  
> > You can also check it with:
> > repadmin /siteoptions <DC> /site:<SITE>
> >  
> > Default-First-Site-Name
> > Current Site Options: (none)  -> means the KCC is not disabled
> >  
> >  
> > Default-First-Site-Name
> > Current Site Options: IS_AUTO_TOPOLOGY_DISABLED 
> > IS_INTER_SITE_AUTO_TOPOLOGY_DISA BLED -> means the KCC is 
> disabled for 
> > intrasite and intersite
> >  
> > Cheers
> > #JORGE#
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: Noah Eiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sat 8/6/2005 6:38 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks, Jorge.
> >  
> > The topology is as follows: 
> > - Each office connects to the hub via a point-to-point VPN. 
> > That is, there is no bridging at the hub -- this is a bandwidth 
> > consideration.
> > - As for AD: we have three sites Hub, B1, B2, and B3. 
> > - Each has a single DC that is also a GC. 
> > - There are three IP site links: Hub-B1, Hub-B2, and Hub-B3. 
> > I am not sure, but at one point there may have been a 
> single site link 
> > containing all sites. If there was, it is gone now.
> > The ISTG created a "web" topology. However, we were getting 
> > replication errors. I manually deleted the connection objects that 
> > connected the hubs to eachother. Those connection objects have not 
> > regenerated. There are no manually created connections. Finally, I 
> > recall that there is a setting (reg
> > edit?) that tells the ISTG to _not_ automatically create 
> connections. 
> > To my knowledge, this setting is not enabled.
> >  
> > Anything else I should check?
> >  
> > -- nme
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> >     From: Almeida Pinto, Jorge de
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >     Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:36 PM
> >     To: [email protected]
> >     Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> >     
> >     
> >     May look as I silly question but can you point out 
> (just to be sure)
> 
> > how your site and replication topology looks like? How many 
> sites and 
> > how many site links do you have and how are those 
> connected? I assume 
> > one domain and each DC = GC...
> >      
> >     #JORGE#
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> >     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Noah Eiger
> >     Sent: Sat 8/6/2005 3:22 AM
> >     To: [email protected]
> >     Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question
> >     
> >     
> > 
> >     Hi Jorge: 
> > 
> >     Thanks for the suggestion. That checkbox was indeed 
> checked. I have
> >     unchecked it and waited longer that a day. Replication 
> seems to have
> 
> > worked
> >     and the box is unchecked at all branch sites. The 
> errors persist at 
> > all
> >     branch sites. 
> > 
> >     Any further thoughts? 
> > 
> >     -- nme
> > 
> >     > -----Original Message----- 
> >     > From: Almeida Pinto, Jorge de 
> >     > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >     > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 10:21 AM 
> >     > To: [email protected];
> > [email protected] 
> >     > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question 
> >     > 
> >     > so, your network is not fully routed? is auto site link 
> >     > bridging enabled or disabled. If it is enabled, disable it! 
> >     >  
> >     > To to so: 
> >     > * start sites and services 
> >     > * goto to Inter site transports 
> >     > * right click IP and uncheck "bridge all sitre links" 
> >     >  
> >     > wait until this has replicated to the other DCs 
> >     >  
> >     > Cheers 
> >     > #JORGE# 
> >     > 
> >     > ________________________________ 
> >     > 
> >     > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of 
> Noah Eiger
> >     > Sent: Thu 8/4/2005 6:41 PM 
> >     > To: [email protected] 
> >     > Subject: [ActiveDir] Branch Office Question 
> >     > 
> >     > 
> >     > Hi - 
> >     >  
> >     > Ok. Finally, one of my questions is ON topic ;-) 
> >     >  
> >     > I have three branch office sites that connect to a single 
> >     > hub. VPN connectivity, Site links, and connection objects 
> >     > only allows each branch to see the hub. Replication is 
> >     > working smoothly and consistently. Yet, I am still seeing 
> >     > repeated errors in the Event Viewers of the branches 
> >     > complaining that they cannot see one another. 
> >     >  
> >     > The options offered in the errors all seem to point to trying 
> >     > to get the branches to see one another (e.g., "publish 
> >     > sufficient site connectivity information..."). I want to tell 
> >     > it not to look for the other branches at all. 
> >     >  
> >     > Specifically, I see: 
> >     >  
> >     > Event Type: Warning 
> >     > Event Source: NTDS KCC 
> >     > Event Category: (1) 
> >     > Event ID: 1566 
> >     > Date:  7/29/2005 
> >     > Time:  11:45:08 AM 
> >     > User:  N/A 
> >     > Computer: BRANCHDC1 
> >     >  
> >     > Event Type: Error 
> >     > Event Source: NTDS KCC 
> >     > Event Category: (1) 
> >     > Event ID: 1311 
> >     > Date:  7/29/2005 
> >     > Time:  11:45:08 AM 
> >     > User:  N/A 
> >     > Computer: BRANCHDC1 
> >     >  
> >     > Thanks. 
> >     >  
> >     > -- nme 
> >     > 
> >     > 
> >     > This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the 
> >     > intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary 
> >     > material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal 
> >     > privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or 
> >     > used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
> >     > recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any 
> >     > attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. 
> >     > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx 
> >     > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx 
> >     > List archive: 
> >     > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ 
> >     > 
> >     >
> > 
> >     List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx 
> >     List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx 
> >     List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> > 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to