Title: DC "replicating" with deleted DSA object
I would suggest that you simply wait, they'll stale-out within 15 days assuming you've not changed any related defaults.  You could delete the stale replication-links with repadmin /delete but it's an unnecessary administrative burden.  For your own peace of mind, run a 2K3's "repdamin /showreps <2K DC fqdn>" ... IIRC they'll not appear in these later versions of the tool since such replication-links are a known entity and are short-lived. 
 
As an aside, 2K3 SP1 has no default stay-of-execution value -- effectively disabling it.

--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com

http://msetechnology.com

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 10:50 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [ActiveDir] DC "replicating" with deleted DSA object

We have recently re-built and upgraded several DCs from w2k to w2k3. The upgrade is achieved as follows:
1. demote w2k DC
2. build and promote w2k3 DC

Sometimes the h/w in 1 and 2 are different but sometimes the same h/w is used.

Furthermore, sometimes the same name is used in 1 and 2 but not always.

If I now execute "repadmin /showreps" on an existing (bridgehead) w2k DC, I see the following issue:

<snip>
    yyyyy\xxxxxxxxxxxx
DEL:620c0fd7-f4f4-46ce-90ef-099659abcef6 (deleted DSA) via RPC
        objectGuid: a6cb3618-9a77-43a6-9ac3-d753b9b112eb
    zzzzz\aaaaaaaaaaaa (deleted DSA) via RPC
        objectGuid: ce82cc75-1c27-416f-808d-3ac461a17a63
    yyyyy\bbbbbbbbbbbb
DEL:a41088e1-0d66-43e8-8b83-a8986f7f6b2a (deleted DSA) via RPC
        objectGuid: 72c4c974-7dc3-43ae-85aa-b427755983fb
<snip>

Where:
xxxxxxxxxx is a DC which was built temporarily and then demoted several days ago
aaaaaaaaaa is a DC which was re-built (as per above) with the same name
bbbbbbbbbb is a DC which was re-built (as per above) with the same name (in the same site as xxxxxxxxxx)

I have been considering using "repadmin /delete" to remove these incorrect replication connections and wondered if anyone had used such a method before or could offer any alternatives?

Thanks,
neil

==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:

http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml

==============================================================================

Reply via email to