In the same spirit - but on the other side of the coin :) - I wouldn't
mind hearing a brief elaboration on your earlier
statement:
"I've found only a few scenarios in which they proved
valuable"
Perhaps one reason might be when one of
the servers in a site is underpowered/waiting to be upgraded,
etc..?
-DaveC
Reuters IS&T Service
Delivery
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:14 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Preferred Bridgeheads
Without wishing to labor the point Russ, what aspect of replication
'speed' was thought to be improved? I ask as I often lecture on AD (and
related technologies) and am interested to understand some of the
misconceptions.
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 6:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Preferred Bridgeheads
We thought it would "help" with replication speed. I
guess it was more of a WAG.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:13 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Preferred Bridgeheads
If you
constrain the list of bridgeheads you may be incapable of replicating an app. NC
in and out of a site since in order to replicate a particular
partition, the bridgehead in question must hold a copy of it ... if the
preferred list contains only 2K DCs, that can't happen .. for the most part
... a 2K3 ISTG will override your choices and allocate a suitable
bridgehead for you, it will however whine and whine and whine and ... you get
the idea.
I've
found only a few scenarios in which they proved valuable ... may I ask why
you're using
them?
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Email: dwells@msetechnology.com
http://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rimmerman, Russ
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 3:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Preferred Bridgeheads
We're almost all
Win2k3 Domain Controllers, have a few left to upgrade.
Question is, we have
at least one DC at each site configured as a preferred bridgehead for IP.
Is this not a good idea? Is it best to not prefer any bridgeheads and let
AD do its job? I'm seeing a lot of event ID 1567's about it as
well.
Thanks
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information of the Cooper Cameron Corporation and its operating Divisions and may be confidential or privileged. This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only by the addressee. If you have received this message in error please delete it, together with any attachments, from your system. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This e-mail is confidential, may contain proprietary information of the Cooper Cameron Corporation and its operating Divisions and may be confidential or privileged. This e-mail should be read, copied, disseminated and/or used only by the addressee. If you have received this message in error please delete it, together with any attachments, from your system. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit http://www.reuters.com/productinfo
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
