Actually, if it's a Single Domain Forest then the Infrastructure Master
has no phantoms to keep track of and thus, can be sent anywhere or left
alone as a paper weight.

So while I agree with Jose that it is perfectly fine to move it, doing
so won't really matter until you have phantoms for the infrastructure
master to keep an eye on.

Just my $0.02

Have a great day!

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Medeiros, Jose
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:17 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Replication Topology

You are correct. However if you have two DC's it doesn't hurt to offload
the infrastructure master role to the DC that dose not have the other 4
roles, even if it's in a single domain forest.

Jose :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Teverovsky, Guy
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:09 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Question on Replication Topology


Am I missing something or having Infrastructure Master running on GC is
an issue in multi-domain forest ?

Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:28 PM
To: activedir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Question on Replication Topology

Dear List Members (Whom I have a hard time figuring out how you all have
so much time to help us "not quite up to speed, but severely overtasked
Administrators");

After a power failure took a Forest Root DC offline over the weekend
(for 26 hours), I came in today to find my replication "in question".
Repadmin /Showreps does not show any errors however, it shows
inconsistent Replication partners.  Here is my question;

We have:
Forest Root Domain (Empty)
DC1 (Holds all 5 roles)  (the DC offline for 26 hours)
DC2 
One Domain in the Forest
DC4
DC5 (Holds all 5 Roles)
DC6

Everyone is W2K3 (no Service Packs) and everyone is a GC and everyone is
a DNS server.

I was positive that I had the Forest Root and Domain at Windows Server
2003 Forest Functional Level but now when I go to AD Domains and Trusts
and click the Forest Root Domain and right click Properties I get:
Domain Functional Level = Windows 2000 mixed
Forest Functional Level = Windows 2000
When I go to AD Domains and Trusts and click the Domain and right click
Properties I get:
Domain Functional Level = Windows Server 2003
Forest Functional Level = Windows 2000

I must have miscalculated, but that's not my question.

In my AD Sites and Services, I have connection objects that have
automatically been generated for each DC but they are inconsistent.  ie:

DC1 goes to DC2 and DC6
DC2 goes to DC1 and DC5
DC4 goes to DC5 and DC6
DC5 goes to DC4 and DC6
DC6 goes to DC1 and DC4 and DC5

The question is, "Shouldn't they all have automatically generated
connection objects to everybody else and if they don't, is it just a
matter of me adding the manual new connection object?"  Or am I seeing a
properly configured Sites and Services.  If not, is part of my problem
that I have not got the Forest Root at FFL?

Thanks in advance people for any assistance.  This list is so valuable,
it's not funny.  (Seriously!)

______________________________
Rocky Habeeb
Microsoft Systems Administrator
James W. Sewall Company
136 Center Street
Old Town, Maine 04468
207.827.4456
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jws.com
______________________________


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to