I honestly don’t know. Why don’t you try it and see?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005
6:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mail
journaling(OT)
now i'm thinking that will alter the mail headers.
i'm not sure if you'd want to do that in an archive situation.
On 9/1/05, Brian
Desmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Right.
Exchange will route the email through the least cost most direct and first
available connector.
I can't
believe that didn't occur to me.
thanks.
sometimes its the stuff right under your nose.
On
9/1/05, Brian Desmond < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well are there
two different providers? Make an smtp connector each and change the address
space…
how can i
point it to two smarthosts?
one for
complaince and one for archival?
i think
you can only send to one smarthost at a time..
On
9/1/05, Brian Desmond < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well the
sector concept is, as Deji said early, pretty bad.
I never setup
a journaling mailbox before, but, why can't you do this contact thing for
everything and route it to wherever you outsource this stuff? You could put two
SMTP addresses on the contact, one for your compliance people and one for your
archiving people (whats the difference?)…
We set
the archive mailbox to go t a contact with the smtp addy of the archive co
which gets sent thru a dedicated smtp connector that only routes that email
domain to a smarthost.
now my
boss wants to use a diff co for archving and another one for complaince.
Sector
has "agents" that make a mapi connection to the journal mailbox and
then forward it via an smtp agent on the same host(win xp with outlook).
You have
one agent per journal box.
we have
about 10 exchange enterprise servers all with the full 4 storage groups and 5
stores.
thats a
lot of mail for mapi.
either
that or you need like a desktop agent per store forwarding out.
still, i
think the concept is faulty.
On
9/1/05, Brian Desmond < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
KVS is
the only product I'm familiar with, and it needs a whole bunch of
pieces on various servers that all tie together.
I don't understand how you would go about offloading internal mail archiving
to a third party ... mail within a routing group is never going to get
routed such that it could leave the routing group and come back in. There
are more than enough people who will gladly have you set your mx record to
them as well as smarthost outbound mail to them, and then they'll stash a
copy in their database somewhere and forward the mail to its final
destination.
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 7:21 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mail journaling(OT)
No disagreement about MAPI. Just not the way he described it.
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com -
we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Martin Tuip
Sent: Thu 9/1/2005 4:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mail journaling(OT)
I believe all of the archiving companies use MAPI as that is the only way
Microsoft has available right now that is supported to do this.
Martin (who works for an Archiving company) :)
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 8:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mail journaling(OT)
If the way you described is the way Sector really does their archiving,
please stay away from them.
Now, since your boss wants to offload this to a 3rd-party, the next logical
question is how much is (s)he willing to spend. There are a number of good
offerings out there and the recommendation will depend on the size of your
budget.
You can start your search from here:
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/partners/archivingandcompliance.asp
Sincerely,
Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com -
we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday? -anon
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Kern, Tom
Sent: Thu 9/1/2005 8:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mail journaling(OT)
Sorry, I meant archiving.
They want to archiving everything to a 3rd party firm and not deal with it.
There has to be a better way than mapi to get the 3rd party all the emails.
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Renouf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 9/1/2005 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mail
journaling(OT)
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
|
