You should see when us "real" IT folks do these tasks ever opening a GUI.
Pretty scary stuff.

Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
c - 312.731.3132
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question)

Trust me... it's a religious thing  :-)

Those of us that have the religion of SBS don't see a problem with the 
wizards .:-)

We're looking to start a support group for former Enterprise Admins who 
are now SBSers <http://msmvps.com/bradley/archive/2005/07/27/59808.aspx>
http://msmvps.com/bradley/archive/2005/07/27/59808.aspx

I'll be honest with you ... the first time I set up 'normal' server and 
'normal' exchange I was extremely surprised how much manual stuff you 
guys do in big server land.  Forestprep and all that.  The next thing I 
was absolutely flabergasted about was how they trust you on the number 
of cals.  'You just stick in a number there?  And they trust you to be 
honest? Wow."  Blew me away.

Actually it's near impossible to get WSS [sharepoint] on a same box as 
Exchange anyway.  There are a couple of folks that tried and finally 
gave up.

Roger Seielstad wrote:

>Actually, I don't think it's a religious issue. The problem with SBS is
that
>its not really the amalgam of Microsoft technologies that it's billed as,
>and as such you can't administer it as you would with all the same apps in
a
>non-SBS implementation.
>
>It's a neat package overall, but the requirement to do the wizard thing
>makes it hard for people like us to deal with it.. 
>
>
>--------
>Roger Seielstad
>E-mail Geek
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 1:06 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question)
>
>And that is a real difficulty.
>
>The wizards should integrate seamlessly. Or the other tools should
integrate
>seamlessly. Take your pick.
>
>I've got a couple of hundred client companies, probably 3 or 4 use SBS.
>I HATE touching the SBS clients because it's a fair bet there is a wizard
>for something that I'm not going to use a wizard for, because I can use one
>of my scripts or a native tool and do it quicker. (You can argue that
>someone that knows the wizards can do it more quickly with them -- and
>that's fine -- but I don't, and shouldn't have to.)
>
>It's a religious issue.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA
>aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
>Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:19 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question)
>
>Difficulty?
>
><cough cough>
>
>What difficulty?  [please feel free to take this offline] the only
difficult
>issues we have in SBSland is cleaning up the messes from folks that don't
>follow the wizards....
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Thanks!  This must be SBS Week.  Was at a user's group meeting last
>>    
>>
>night and the topic came up again. (Main topic was R2)  Sounds like
>Microsoft is getting the message about the difficulty of working with SBS.
>  
>
>>Al Maurer
>>Service Manager, Naming and Authentication Services IT | Information 
>>Technology Agilent Technologies
>>(719) 590-2639; Telnet 590-2639
>>http://activedirectory.it.agilent.com
>>----------------------------------------------
>>"Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war"  - Anthony, in Julius
>>    
>>
>Caesar III i. 
>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
>>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 1:57 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS migration (was SBS Server Question)
>>
>>Transition pack or www.sbsmigration.com
>>
>>Transition pack is the best way however lets you keep the Remote web 
>>workplace and monitoring email even after you break away from SBSland.
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>>>OK, since the topic came up:  I'm trying to figure out how to migrate
>>>      
>>>
>off SBS2003.
>  
>
>>>Scenario is a recent acquisition where we want to migrate from company
>>>      
>>>
>SBS to corporate AD (standard 2003 domain).  Trusts are out.  Hack is both
>dangerous and illegal.
>  
>
>>>MS offers a Transition Pack (for a cost) to upgrade the SBS2003 to
>>>      
>>>
>normal AD.  Is there any other way?  LDIF export?
>  
>
>>>Thanks,
>>>AL
>>>
>>>Al Maurer
>>>Service Manager, Naming and Authentication Services IT | Information 
>>>Technology Agilent Technologies
>>>(719) 590-2639; Telnet 590-2639
>>>http://activedirectory.it.agilent.com
>>>----------------------------------------------
>>>"Cry 'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war"  - Anthony, in Julius
>>>      
>>>
>Caesar III i. 
>  
>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan 
>>>Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 12:06 PM
>>>To: [email protected]
>>>Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SBS Server Question
>>>
>>>Nope.  No trusts, no forests.  We're the spoiled only PDC that must 
>>>hold all the FSMO roles.  We can do some funky stuff with pass through
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>authentication, but no trusts.
>>>
>>>US versus THEM:
>>>http://www.sbslinks.com/Us_v_them.htm
>>>
>>>In SBS 2000/2003 the 'correct' terminology is Yes, an 'additional 
>>>domain controller' is supported and not calling it a BDC.
>>>
>>>Member servers are covered by the SBS cals but last I read in the PUR 
>>>the additional DC would need server cals.  [that's my interpretation 
>>>anyway but I get a headache reading that doc in the first place]
>>>
>>>Honestly ...keep in mind that with XPs, they will used cached 
>>>credentials and you can log into that profile even if the network is 
>>>down.  Now comes the fun... who's doing the DHCP? The recommended way 
>>>is to have the SBS box to do that...so you still have fun.  If the SBS
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>>box goes down, I normally have ways around the temporarily failure 
>>>[and even then I can count on one hand the time my network has been
>>>      
>>>
>affected....
>  
>
>>>power mostly, then NICs, then switches, and one harddrive falling off 
>>>a RAID.  Get good equipment [and honestly either reinstall those OEMs 
>>>and stay away from those preinstalled versions] and we do just fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Medeiros, Jose wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi Susan,
>>>>
>>>>Since we have an SBS MVP on the Active Dir list, let me ask a
>>>>        
>>>>
>question.
>  
>
>>>>Can I now make an SBS 2003 server a child domain in an AD 2003
>>>>        
>>>>
>forest? 
>  
>
>>>>Before you ask why, some one asked me this recently at a Linux users
>>>>        
>>>>
>group meeting, as his company has several remote offices using SBS 2003.
>  
>
>>>>Also on SBS 4.5, one could have a BDC as a backup, can this also be
>>>>        
>>>>
>done with a DC or are you " Sh.T out of luck " when a box fails? 
>  
>
>>>>Jose
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>>>>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>>>>List archive: 
>>>>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>> 
>>
>>    
>>
>
>--
>Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?  
>http://www.threatcode.com
>
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>List archive:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
>List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
>List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
>List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
>  
>
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to