Not paging, but ranging. You are returning a single object that has a large
number of values for a single attribute, it forces Exchange to handle the
group in a special one-off way. I have done a lot of work around trying to
figure out exactly what is happening and Exchange really does some
"different" things when it has to do this. In fact, I even have a theory
that once it needs to range it uses something other than the WLDAP32 library
for the LDAP queries. I base this on the fact that Insight for AD which
hooks the WLDAP32 calls doesn't see the ranging queries from Exchange but
sees them from any other apps that range and also I see the traffic in a
network trace captures and in Tracelogs. 

I have an unvoiced theory also that breaking the DLs up into smaller sized
can help when someone creates rules that have a condition of "from a DL"
which forces an enumeration of the DLs and some of the nested DLs as well
for every message to that mailbox. 




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: exchange max. dist. list size

I saw this:
"distribution list size in exchange?"
and jumped on it. I should have thought about client side.
 
On a related note, however, I don't believe that the problem of DL size in
Exchange is on the Exchange side. Usually, where applications have had
problems enumerating more than 1000 DL membership, the problem is most
likely in the failure of that application to handle paging. Best practices,
IMO, would dictate that whoever is writing an app that queries a DL should
account for the possibility of the DL containing more than a 1000 object,
and put in paging accordingly.
 
I have used nested groups, but more for
administrative/organizational/aesthetic purposes than to compensate for any
Exchange-specific limitations.
 
 
Sincerely,

Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of joe
Sent: Wed 9/21/2005 2:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: exchange max. dist. list size



Hey Deji... Remember the client side. :o) It is a personal DL and I believe
150-200 is the limit.

As for Server DLs (i.e. AD Groups), MS recommends that you stick to sizes of
500-1000 and if you need to go above that to nest them. I would say that
with AD 2003 I would go to 1500[1] but from what I have seen in how things
work with the queries and other items that I can't go too deeply in now
including rule expansion of "from a DL" rules I would also say that smaller
DLs that are nested is probably the way to go.

   joe

[1] The issue breaks down to how many members are returned prior to ranging
kicking in.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: exchange max. dist. list size

I don't have exact figures, but your numbers are unbelievably low. 200 max?
I have DLs with 2300, and those are small.

What gives you this impression? Are you using a tool that's barfing when
expanding DLs with more than 200 membership?


Sincerely,

Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about
Yesterday?  -anon

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 9/21/2005 8:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: exchange max. dist. list size



Has anyone encountered the max distribution list size in exchange?



Seems like it's 8KB, or between 100-200 email addresses?



Am I missing something?



Thanks,

James

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to