|
Item 2 is kinda the part that I read as saying "uh...you sure you want
to do that?" Operations that are not supported include the following:
Fugleberg, David A wrote: As I read it, The KB cited does NOT say that 'having a DC in a Virtual Server environment is not supported'. In fact, MS has published a paper (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=64DB845D-F7A3- 4209-8ED2-E261A117FC6B&displaylang=en) with explicit guidance on how to successfully run DCs on virtual server.The cited KB DOES explain that bringing a backed up virtual DC online to recover from a failure will cause problems (because of the USN rollback issue). As has been pointed out many times on this list, restoring a failed DC from a disk image (Ghost, .vhd file, whatever) is a spectacularly Bad Idea. As I understand it, this is primarily because all DCs track some metadata about the state of the AD NC replicas on their replication partners (the High-Watermark Vector, the Up-To-Date vector, and the GUID of the replica itself, for example). If a failed DC is 'restored' by reviving an old image, the partner DCs will believe the DC is more up-to-date than it really is, and replication will suffer. The hotfix in the cited KB article will protect you somewhat by logging an event and stopping netlogon, but you still need to clean it up. On the other hand, restoring a DC using normal System State restore procedures causes the restored replica to get a new GUID, so it's obvious to the replication partners that they're dealing with a 'different' replica and normal replication can allow it to catch up. So, "DC on VS" = OK, but "restoring a disk image of a DC" = BAD. Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] AD Restore Problem <stupid question alert> Okay so unless you are insane SBS.. images of your DCs are ixnay. What does Sun, Linux, Mac or any other competing Server OS do in their world to ensure the Kingdom easily and quickly comes back up? <yeah I know they don't have AD but they have to have some competing glue, right?> What have they done if anything? How to detect and recover from a USN rollback in Windows Server 2003: http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=875495 That KB is interesting as it clearly indicates that having a DC in a Virtual Server environment is not supported... yet we SBSers have gotten word that once Exchange 2003 sp2 supports Vserver all of the parts of the 'standard' box will be supported in a virtual environment. Brett Shirley wrote: -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.comList info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ |
Re: [ActiveDir] AD Restore Problem
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:59:13 -0700
- Re: [ActiveDir] AD Restore ... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... Mark Parris
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... deji
- Re: [ActiveDir] AD... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... Rob MOIR
- Re: [ActiveDir] AD... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... Mark.Whitby
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... CHIANESE, DAVID
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... Rob MOIR
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... CHIANESE, DAVID
- RE: [ActiveDir] AD Res... Rick Kingslan
