When we have inplaced upgraded SBS 2000's to SBS 2003's they leave
behind a mixmass of permissions.... i.e. a blend of 2000 and 2003. Many
in our gang really do not like inplaces at all. You don't get a
comparable box to a clean 2003.
You want nice, clean 2003 permission structure? You'll want to swing
over those roles.
ActiveDirectory wrote:
My personal opinion is that you carry less crap over if you bring up a
new 2k3 DC (even if only temporarily). You can always reformat and
reuse the original server then move it back if you need to.
Bob
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Alborzfard,
Alex
*Posted At:* Monday, October 10, 2005 8:26 AM
*Posted To:* ActiveDirectory
*Conversation:* AD Migration Question
*Subject:* [ActiveDir] AD Migration Question
I have a W2K AD that I want to migrate to W2K3 AD. What’s the best
option: In-place upgrade of the W2K DC or standing up a brand new W2K3
DC server
And then upgrade the W2K DC to W2K3?
By the way the W2K DC is also running DNS, DHCP, & WINS. I have one
more DNS server. If I go the second route do I need to set up a DNS
server or can I use the existing ones?
Thanks
--Alex
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
