Good points, thanks Al.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn
how to do it." - Pablo Picasso

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?

I don't know the answer to that exact question.  What I was after was
the
WAN link QoS vs. the desktop to server.  The reason for that is that
it's
likely that you have a 10/100/1000 ethernet network at the remote site.
That's WAY more than the WAN link.  But once on the WAN link, you'll
want to
ensure that you prioritize your traffic to ensure that if anything has
to
wait, it's not the cc traffic. 

That's a WAN router issue vs. a desktop issue. I've never even given the
desktop QoS a second look, personally. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 4:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?


Al speaking of QoS (and feel free to mail me offline [whoever] if it's
too
off-topic)... I have never really bothered with QoS on XP because most
users
(IMHO) do not use anything that takes advantage of it.  In order to use
it
for our credit card processing traffic, would it be true that all
devices
and the software that forwards it would have to support QoS?  i.e. the
app
in the store that submits the request via SSL, the store router, our
router
here, etc?  Anyone know some basic white papers that discuss that
without me
having to study to pass the QoS Certification Test?

Thanks 
Rich

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn
how to
do it." - Pablo Picasso

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 2:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?

Ah.  I see where you're coming from then. 

Layer 8 issues can be tough to solve.  I like to add l1 to l7 and see if
I
can match. 

I wouldn't expect auth traffic to tip the scales, but I really think the
should be asked to investigate QoS (if network is a separate group of
people; otherwise disregard). 



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 12:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?


Thanks Al - 

The factor at issue here is simply the addition of the workgroup
computers
to the domain.  They currently do everything over that link, but they're
not
domain members.  People think that authentication traffic would break
the
connectivity! :)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn
how to
do it." - Pablo Picasso

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?

Having been in that situation you are correct that it's likely very
little
over the wire at initial logon.  It's if they have to access anything
back
across the wire or if they let Outlook run in cached mode that you'll
see
differences.  Outlook and other apps are variables that are hard to
measure
in this case.  I also would watch out for the client-side antivirus
software
- been bit by that in the past in a similar situation.  If GPO's or
logon
scripts get out of hand, that could be another variable risk to account
for,
but...

As for your cc transactions, what ever happened to QoS on the routers?
If
it's that important, wouldn't it make sense to not leave it to chance
like
that? 

Al

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?


Thanks Bob... I actually used that article too, once upon a time, though
it's way more detail than I was looking for.  There's another one more
recent, it goes into server authentication details - way TMI.  You know,
we're not even talking multiple machines, just one. The serious thing is
that we can't impact cc transactions.  But even so... I tested it and
with a
first-time user log on, it spiked the graph to just over 50 kbps.
Subsequent
logons were in the 40 kbps range, and only briefly.  No one here at the
technical level is worried about it - note how I was asking about how
much
bandwidth it uses, not how much of a noticeable delay might there be :)

Rich

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Free, Bob
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 2:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?

Rich- 

This paper isn't XP/2003 but essentially a lot of the same principals
apply.
I found this paper very illuminating in it's day so maybe it will be of
some
use to you. As far as the feasibility, I spent a lot of time at the
wrong
end of an ISDN line and it wasn't that bad but I never had more than 2
machines connected concurrently.

Windows 2000 Startup and Logon Traffic Analysis:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/deploy/conf
eat/w2kstart.mspx

HTH

Bob

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Milburn
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ActiveDir] single login size in bytes?



Does anyone happen to know a rough idea how many bytes are transmitted
when
a single user logs on to an XP box to a W2K3 AD, assuming cached
credentials
aside?  I've been goog searching and finding a lot of detailed info
about
replication but not much about the size of the authentication packets
etc. I
am digging out net monitor as I type (well almost as I type) to see for
myself, but anyone who would like to comment on the feasibility of
having XP
machines on the far end of a 56K frame circuit actually being members of
the
domain, please feel free to let me know.  We're talking simple logging
in,
including a single GPO or maybe two - but no replication, etc.  They do
already get their email using Outlook to a pst.  

 

And please don't laugh.  This is a very serious issue. ;-)

 

Rich

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Rich Milburn
MCSE, Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Sr Network Analyst, Field Platform Development
Applebee's International, Inc.
4551 W. 107th St
Overland Park, KS 66207
913-967-2819
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
"I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn
how to
do it." - Pablo Picasso

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        ________________________________

        -------APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY
NOTICE------- 
        PRIVILEGED / CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this
message or any attachments. This information is strictly confidential
and
may be subject to attorney-client privilege. This message is intended
only
for the use of the named addressee. If you are not the intended
recipient of
this message, unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution,
or
using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If
you
have received this in error, you should kindly notify the sender by
reply
e-mail and immediately destroy this message. Unauthorized interception
of
this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal law. Applebee's
International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review the content
of
all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or
from
this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's International, Inc.
e-mail system. 

                ________________________________

        
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

-------APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE-------
PRIVILEGED / 
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any
attachments. 
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to
attorney-client 
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named
addressee.
If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized
forwarding,

printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, you
should 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this
message. 
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal
criminal
law. 
Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review
the 
content of all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages
sent
to 
or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's
International,
Inc. 
e-mail system.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

-------APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE-------
PRIVILEGED / 
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any
attachments. 
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to
attorney-client 
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named
addressee.
If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized
forwarding,

printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, you
should 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this
message. 
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal
criminal
law. 
Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review
the 
content of all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages
sent
to 
or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's
International,
Inc. 
e-mail system.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

-------APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE-------
PRIVILEGED / 
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any
attachments. 
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to
attorney-client 
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named
addressee.
If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized
forwarding,

printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, you
should 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this
message. 
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal
criminal
law. 
Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review
the 
content of all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages
sent
to 
or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's
International,
Inc. 
e-mail system.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

-------APPLEBEE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE------- PRIVILEGED 
/ 
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION may be contained in this message or any attachments. 
This information is strictly confidential and may be subject to attorney-client 
privilege. This message is intended only for the use of the named addressee. If 
you are not the intended recipient of this message, unauthorized forwarding, 
printing, copying, distribution, or using such information is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this in error, you should 
kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately destroy this message. 
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal criminal 
law. 
Applebee's International, Inc. reserves the right to monitor and review the 
content of all messages sent to and from this e-mail address. Messages sent to 
or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Applebee's International, Inc. 
e-mail system.
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to