joe is too kind...he's glossing over the bit where he kept saying "If
that [EMAIL PROTECTED] Laura makes -one- -more- [EMAIL PROTECTED] grammar 
fix...".  :-)

(And joe, if you do Theory of Computation, you may become my best
friend during my next grad class.  I fully expect to hire a tutor and
just have the person move into my house for 16 weeks.  :o))

On 10/14/05, joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey I needed to maintain a certain quality....
>
> Did you send something to Robbie to say you wanted to review it? In the end
> we were begging for reviewers, I even took Dean as a reviewer and you know
> the edge I had to be on for that.... He kept wanting to spell words wrong.
> Eventually I just took out all references to the words color, humor, and
> other or words.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 7:31 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
> joe said: "Again, the reviewers did a fantastic job."
>
> Of which, you will all notice when the book comes out, I am _NOT_ one of
> those reviewers.....
>
> joe said: "They kept me honest...."
>
> Which is one of the reason _WHY_ I was not one of those reviewers....
>
> Rick
>
> P.S.  Hey, joe....  :op
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 6:10 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
> Not out yet, I am expecting Mid November or Early December. I sent an email
> to see if I can find out.
>
> The book is NOT written in my voice, I tried as best as possible to maintain
> the voice that was there. I simply revised it though I did add a Chapter on
> ADAM and a chapter on some basic Exchange/AD Scripting. If you have the
> first or second edition I think you will find this edition worthy of picking
> up even if you don't have Windows Server 2003 SP1 or R2. I tried fleshing
> out and changing anything I didn't feel was "right". Also the reviewers all
> did a bangup job finding things I missed. I admit I didn't sleep much in
> August or September. Tony may have noticed a lull in the list volume, me
> working on that book saved at least 2 bazillion helpless bits from being
> sacrificed.
>
> I learned that revising a book may actually be harder than writing a book
> from scratch and you get paid less. Well maybe it is depending on if you
> know what you want to write about. With revising you can't just write, you
> have to read, reread, write, reread, write, reread, tweak, reread. When you
> change the flow and feel and voice it is like hitting a brick wall when
> reading. I am sure I didn't get rid of all of the bricks but I certainly
> tried to knock the walls down to a point where you can step over them
> without too much trouble. Anyway, I spent less time writing the ADAM chapter
> than I spent updating the security chapter. I know now that I probably
> should have just rewritten from scratch and it would have gone faster. Oh
> well, live and learn or don't live long.
>
> Again, the reviewers did a fantastic job. They kept me honest when I tried
> to skip over some stuff when I got tired and I thank them profusely. I tried
> to do them justice in the small space provided to me for acknowledgements.
> Those are the things people tend not to look at at the front of the book. I
> do ask that if you pick up the book, you do look. Those, folks, deserve,
> the: attention.
>
>
>  joe
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rocky Habeeb
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
> joe, > "Active Directory Third Edition"
> What is this?  Where is it?
>
> RH
> _________________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 11:12 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
>
> I would not be surprised. I know this list has become quite popular and for
> good reason. It is one of the few places where I learn things that I don't
> stumble over myself. Many times I learn things when people make random
> comments about their environment which kicks a realization in myself on how
> something probably works in the backend. It is pretty cool.
>
> On the downside sounds like my total sales on Active Directory Third Edition
> will be in the area of 2000 copies which isn't going to buy me a 100ft ocean
> ready cruiser. ;o)
>
> Understood on posting the lurker list. On top of the spammers, I am sure
> some lurkers would not be happy to be out-ed like that. I don't have an
> issue with lurkers myself. In fact I would love to hear we have some 25000
> lurkers, it means a lot of people are getting a lot of good info.
>
>
> > Everyone has to send me 25% of their income. It's only fair really.
>
> Does the postal service even deliver to NZ?
>
>
>   joe
>
> P.S. So now I am feeding everyone? No wonder my pantry is empty!
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Murray
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:35 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
> Well, if I told you we have around 1500 people subscribed in standard mode
> and a couple of hundred subscribed in digest mode, would you be surprised?
> :-)
>
> I could post the lurker list, but I don't really want spammers to get hold
> of it.
>
> Personally, I have no problem with lurkers.  And, hey, it's my list. :-)
>
> On the subject of money, I'm considering operating the list in the style
> of a TV evangelist.  Everyone has to send me 25% of their income.   It's
> only fair really.
>
> Tony
>
> PS.  Joe, I've had no complaints about you to date.  Why would people want
> to bite the hand that feeds them?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Friday, 14 October 2005 12:09 p.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
> Oh just a joke, I don't think Tony would do it. Though I wouldn't mind Tony
> occasionally posting the lurker list, I am curious as to how many people I
> am getting mad at me any given day. :o)
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Gilbert
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 6:58 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
>
> Not to hijack this thread but, I hope lurking remains free.
>
> Dan
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
> > From: "joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Thu, October 13, 2005 2:50 pm
> > To: <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > I have found that shooting for your contract salary is as good a
> > target as
> any, but expect to miss unless you didn't get a very good contract rate.
> I have only seen one case where a company was willing to pay contract level
> fees to a FTE and that was back when I first got back into the industry (I
> burned out on it back when I was about 21 or so and left it) and had been
> completely screwed over by the contract house for my rate where they were
> making at least as much as I was. When I said I was leaving the FTE offer I
> received would have been a 60% raise from my previous salary. Unfortunately,
> the new contract position I was taking was a 100%+ increase and with OT
> (which you don't get as a FTE) ended up being a 200% increase.
> >
> > Anyway, you tend to take a considerable hit (I have seen reductions of
>
> > 20%-75% for FTE offers and all but one of which I turned down cold)
> > but you try to make it up in benefits such as vaca, retirement,
> > insurance, etc. As a contractor you tend to have a different mindset
> > than as an FTE as well. As a contractor it is jump for the money and
> > your mind should always be ready to make that jump. As FTE it seems
> > people get in a rut and don't want to move once they start to get a
> > feeling of ownership. Personally I wouldn't be an FTE but for a very
> > small handful of companies where I really like and respect the
> > management. My manager I have now is probably one of the best managers
>
> > in the universe, he is certainly the best I have had to this point in
> > my "career" and I have had several good managers. He is the kind of
> > guy that you love or hate, if you aren't above the curve, you hate
> > him. But then I have often been described as the person you love or
> > hate myself. I had one manager once say of me, "joe is the Bill
> > Lambeer of IT, if he is on y
> our team you feel great and you love him. If he isn't, you want to kill
> him.". Another said "joe is worth his weight in gold and he ain't a small
> guy...". After I heard that one I went and asked for a raise.
> Somehow I failed.
> >
> > Every time I have negotiated with someone on any job I always just ask
>
> > up
> front, so what salary or rate are you thinking. If the range is some
> ridiculous range like $50k-$300k which headhunters like to do because they
> think they are bright or something I tell the person they need to give a
> more realistic range of somewhere within $10k and it better not be pumped up
> with possible bonuses (Bonuses are not salary). If they can't or won't,
> spend your time elsewhere.
> >
> >
> > Keep in mind, whatever rate you ask for, make sure it covers sending
> > gifts
> of beer and chocolate and possibly money to the members of this list for
> keeping your head above water. I don't think any single person has generated
> such a volume in the number of questions asked since I have been watching
> this list. It actually made me wonder at one point if Tony could somehow
> arrange it so that people pay for every question asked and they get credit
> for every answer given that people vote on and say is a good answer. If no
> one can answer the question (note that isn't the same as the answer doesn't
> work for someone for whatever localized reason) then full refund.
> >
> >    joe
> >
> >
> >
> >   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Kern
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 9:37 PM
> > To: activedirectory
> > Subject: [ActiveDir] salary(OT)
> >
> >
> >
> > well, i've been consulting for 2 months full time for a company and
> > now they want to make me an offer to work for them(yeah,i'm amazed
> > too..)
> At first it was a head/senior AD position  but now they want to throw in
> Exchange in the mix.
> > they used to outsource all their windows infrastructure and during my
> tenure there, they took it back so they have no AD/Exchange people.
> >
> > This is a 3000 user finanical corp in Manhattan.
> >
> > my question is, what kind of salary would one expect for a such a
> position, taking into account the bussiness and location and size.
> >
> >
> > thanks
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> ########################################################################
> #####
> This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me
> immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this
> communication or disclose anything about it. Thank You.
>
> Please note that this communication does not designate an information system
> for the purposes of the NZ Electronic Transactions Act 2002.
>
> This email has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by NetIQ
> MailMarshal at Gen-i.
> ########################################################################
> #####
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
>
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
>


--
-----------------------
Laura E. Hunter
Microsoft MVP - Windows Server Networking
Author: _Active Directory Consultant's Field Guide_ (http://tinyurl.com/7f8ll)
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to