ACS is now integrated into MOM3 which is coming I don't know when. Thanks, Brian Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED] c - 312.731.3132
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B. Simon-Weidner Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 5:37 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Knowing when users were deleted. Another Hmm. I'd still like to see that better configured that putting it into the AD if the infos are already there (or configurable). We could request to make it default to log that kind of info. And as far as we are talking about looking into every server: Where's ACS? And also SNMP would be an option to get notified on a single system instead of looking into every DC. Ulf |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick |Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:10 AM |To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org |Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Knowing when users were deleted. | |I'll see your Eurocents and add raise you two. :) | |I fully understand where you're coming from Ulf. Adding this |information into the DIT when it is currently possible to get |is something that grates against common sense and common |engineering principles even if you subscribe to belts and |braces methodologies. | |However, I think two things make this a worthwhile request |with a big payoff. First to Laura's point about diminishing |returns. I agree, at some point there will be diminishing |returns. I also believe that as hardware gets bigger (i.e. |Standard 80 GB hard drives, 1 GB memory in workstation |machines, etc. [1]) the bar gets raised until we get to the |diminishing return. Since we're targeting 80/20 out of the |box [2] it seems reasonable that 80% of the deployments would |benefit from such a change. The other 20 would be those that |a) don't care or know about such things and b) those that |can't tolerate the additional overhead and therefore wouldn't |want to deploy it. I say tough pickles to them. :) |Seriously, this could be on by default but configurable (group |policy?) to disable it as a performance issue etc. | |Second, I think that the major benefit is the ability to |actually get usable information native to the product vs. |having to invest in a third party product. Why? Because today |in order to get that information I have to have something that |scrapes the Security logs looking for such information. Is |this a good idea? I think it is. Is it something that could |be native? I think it could and should be native if |technically feasible. | |Making us look in a particular DC's event logs is more |difficult than it should be without yet another product. |That's fine for the really large companies that have deeper |pockets, and larger needs. For the small to medium |businesses, it should not be so difficult nor should it |*require* SQL licensing or expertise. | | | |[1] I'm not saying that the quality has kept up, only that the |hardware is bigger, faster, stronger and cheaper. |[2] I'm making that up, but it sounds reasonable | | | | |-----Original Message----- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ulf B. |Simon-Weidner |Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 4:42 PM |To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org |Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Knowing when users were deleted. | | |Hmm. | |Do we really want to excuse prior failure of proper auditing |by putting more data into AD? Wouldn't that lead into every |request of non-configured auditing to requests for extending |the AD? Do it right the first way. | |I completely agree that we should make the people more |auditing aware, and it would be great to have a centralized |auditing together with some force of configuration instead of |the per server events and auditing which is rearly configured. | |However I'm not sure if I want this kind of data in the AD. | |Just my Eurocents. | |Ulf | ||-----Original Message----- ||From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ||[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laura E. ||Hunter ||Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 10:28 PM ||To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org ||Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Knowing when users were deleted. || ||Various thoughts from this thread: || ||[1] I agree with Al and Paul[1] on a desire for that sort of |metadata. ||I'm not as convinced of the trade-off value of bloating the DIT for ||full undelete information, particularly in monster big environments. ||For my teeny-tiny single domain it probably wouldn't be that bad of a ||hit, but I imagine that the laws of diminishing returns would quickly ||set in. || ||[2] Please finish the thought, Brett, I'm sure I'd find it ||helpful/enlightening/informative even if it's only speaking in ||hypotheticals. || ||[3] It's Gil and Darren's turn to crack me up today, I guess joe is ||taking a break. || || ||[1] *waves* Hi Paul! Glad to see you alive post-Summit. || ||- L ||List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx ||List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx ||List archive: ||http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ || | | |List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx |List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx |List archive: |http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ |List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx |List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx |List archive: |http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ | List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
