If you scroll down a little farther on that page you'll find a post on
how to get it to also update as non admin.
Part one last night [just getting it to run] worked even on the 2006
version with the new SQL backend [Sybase SQLanywhere mind you]
But yes, even in 2006 it still requires admin /power user rights.
Crawford, Scott wrote:
Actually, it was just pointed out to me that I copied and pasted
correctly, but when I was applying the perm to
HKLM\Software\Classes\CLSID\{E53C85D6-E6D9-4BCF-A632-72062A99AA7F}, that
key didn't exist and I instead applied it to
HKLM\Software\Classes\CLSID\{E53C85D6-E6D9-4BCF-A623-72062A99AA7F} (just
change A632 to A623. Apparently that's the difference between
QuickBooks Pro and QuickBooks Premium.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: QuickBooks 2005 permissions
I will have to try that on the 2006 beta. The last time I tried to do
'just' certain Classes roots that I saw in filemon/regmon it would not
load.
I also had to do \common files\Intuit
If it works I'll update the instructions
http://www.sbslinks.com/lua2.htm
Crawford, Scott wrote:
A few weeks ago, there was some mention of the required permissions to
run Quickbooks as a non-admin user. According to this site:
http://www.quickbooksgroup.com/webx/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ the
perms needed are Users:W to the following locations:
HKLM\Software\Intuit
HKLM\Software\Classes\QuickBooks.CoLocator.1
HKLM\Software\Classes\CLSID\{E53C85D6-E6D9-4BCF-A632-72062A99AA7F}
C:\Program Files\Intuit
Whenever I've tracked these things down, I just give users full
control
to the needed locations instead of trying to determine the exact perms
needed. Furthermore, I generally apply the perms to the root of the
apps folder. For example, I'll grant the perms at the root Intuit
folder instead of chasing down the one or two files that actually need
to be modified. This tends to eliminate future problems when somebody
uses some new function of the app that hasn't been tested and it needs
to write to a different file. Anyway, I thought some of you might be
interested. I just tried it here and all seems good.
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
