"Security update MS05-019 has been updated to correct this issue. For more information, visit the following Microsoft Web site: "

Okay now I'm totally confused.

05-019 in the bulletin says that the fix is in Windows 2003 sp1

But the http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/prodtech/windowsserver2003/sp1.mspx
here says it doesn't include 05-019

I give up.  You are right but that page is wrong.

Apply both.


Derek Harris wrote:
The link to ms05-019 is for machines WITHOUT SP1.
The links to the hotfixes for machines with SP1 installed are lower on
the page.
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=898060

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley,
CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 3:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Root Domain on W2K3 SP1 and Child not

Well 05-019 was rereleased

V2.0 (June 14, 2005): Microsoft updated this bulletin today to advise
customers that a revised version of the security update is available. We
recommend installing this revised security update even if you have
installed the previous version. The revised security update will be
available through Windows Update, Software Update Services (SUS), and
will be recommended by the Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer (MBSA).



Nathan Casey wrote:
Thats the one..if you follow that link, the resolution section states:
Security update MS05-019 has been updated to correct this issue. For
more information, visit the following Microsoft Web site:
and links here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms05-019.mspx

this links does not include an updated version of the hotfix for W2k3
systems that have SP1 installed.



[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/4/2005 2:11:01 PM >>>
Installing security update MS05-019 or Windows Server 2003 Service Pack
1 may cause network connectivity between clients and servers to fail:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=898060

Are you sure you don't mean that hotfix?

This required before applying Exchange 2003 sp2 btw.

Nathan Casey wrote:
you mentioned that W2K3 SP1 includes the original version of MS05-019
and that if MS05-019 related issues were being experienced that the
updated version should be applied. I am testing the SP1 upgrade on DC's
in the lab and was looking for the updated version here:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms05-019.mspx

On this link there is no MS05-019 update for W2k3 SP1. Does anyone
know where the updated version can be found?
Thanks

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/15/2005 6:43:02 AM >>>
2K3 and 2K3 SP1 DC's should interoperate with no issues besides the potential list of known issues with SP1 in general. ie: SP1 includes the original version of MS05-019. So if that patch caused you grief then you could potentially see communication issues between

the DC's unless you installed the updated version of the patch. SP1 also includes changes in RPC that cause some firewalls to drop the
packets until they're patched.
Assuming you've done your testing and due diligence and either aren't

affected by the known issues or have addressed them then there should

be nothing inherently wrong with RTM and SP1 side by side, even within the same Domain.


  _____

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simpsen,
Paul A.
(HSC)
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 8:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Root Domain on W2K3 SP1 and Child not



First off thanks for all the info I've soaked in. I've hung in the background for a few years and have tried to soak it all in.tried I
said!
Quick question = we are running Function level W2K3 with a root domain and 2 child domains. We have yet to install SP1 but plan on it

this weekend. With
1 of the child domains we see the possibility of some problems due to

old HW so we want to postpone SP1 on that child until we refresh the 9 DC's with new HW. We should have this done in the next 30 days or so. In the meantime we are still planning to roll out SP1 to the other child and to the root. I don't see any problems with this plan and have found nothing in MY searches to scare us off. Can there be issues with this config? I know it is not optimal but any big issues to worry about? I appreciate any feedback I can get.

Once again thanks!

Paul A Simpsen

IT - Infrastructure Services Team

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

800 NE 15th St. Suite 620

Oklahoma City, OK. 73104

(405)271-2262 x 50230

Fax (405)271-2181

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication and any attachments

may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
destroy all copies of this communication and any attachments.

List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/



--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
  • Re: [ActiveDir] Root Domain... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]

Reply via email to