Rick added, to Ed: > Who ARE you, anyway? See, this thread has just got REAL interesting...
[takes out chips and coke, settles back into recliner chair to take in the show that may begin] Personalising posts makes technical lists just that more enjoyable. themolk. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan > Sent: Tuesday, 8 November 2005 6:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FYI: MS-KBQ909360 - Potential file > corruption on NTFS volumes > > Ed - > > With all due respect, both posts that you've made in response > to this thread have been negative (George Carlin hasn't > written anything original... Blah, > blah...) and the fact that I mention that I should beat my > admin because of missing a backup. How I choose to treat my > employees is my business. > > I'm not sure why I'm even bothering to defend myself to you. > > Please. If you have nothing of value to add - don't respond. > If you want to be a valued member of the list - try being nice. > > Or, if it's just me you don't like - filter me out of your list. > > I really don't appreciate the off-handed, single thought retorts. > > Who ARE you, anyway? > > Rick > -- > Posting is provided "AS IS", and confers no rights or warranties ... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed > Crowley [MVP] > Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 11:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FYI: MS-KBQ909360 - Potential file > corruption on NTFS volumes > > The admin is not at fault because he wasn't aware that the > backup didn't complete? You're an awfully forgiving boss. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan > Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 7:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] FYI: MS-KBQ909360 - Potential file > corruption on NTFS volumes > > Work with Exchange much? Miss one or two backups and that > volume that holds your log files might experience this issue > with no fault of the admin at all. (Well, except for the > fact that your backup system didn't page the person in charge > to notify it didn't run... Or, that person chose not to > respond.) > > Regardless... Poo-poo happens. At least, now they know. > > Rick [msft] > -- > Posting is provided "AS IS", and confers no rights or warranties ... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] > Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 10:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] FYI: MS-KBQ909360 - Potential file > corruption on NTFS volumes > > Not dumb for Microsoft.... dumb for the Admin to get the > drive in that condition and need a KB to wack them upside the head. > > At the end of the day... it's my responsibility for my > network. I won't be complaining to Microsoft that they > didn't warn me that bad things might happen if I don't keep > nice breathing room on my drives. > > > > > > Rick Kingslan wrote: > > >Hmmm. I guess I see this in a different light. In my "new, > improved" > >view of the way that Microsoft communicates things, no - it doesn't > >seem to be very dumb at all. The statement and the KB, that is. > > > >At this moment, I'm watching George Carlin's new HBO special. He > >relates that he's always interested when it's flood season in the > >Midwest. The same people that got flooded out last year get flooded > >out this year, repaint, re-carpet and move back in. > > > >Next season - it will be the same thing. They just won't understand > >that if they live on the flood plain, you can't complain > that Grandma > >is floating down the river with a canary on her head. > > > >That's why we say things like: > > > >"A volume is full or almost full." your NTFS just MIGHT have > problems. > > > >Because there are just those same folks on the Midwest flood > plain that > >will call PSS really upset that their full or almost full NTFS drive > >has a problem. > > > >I'm not saying that the people that call are stupid. I am > saying that > >most Insurance policies and contracts, as well as EULAs - > have a ton of > >words and verbiage that only the well trained lawyer can understand > >because folks are just.... well, litigious. And, you have > to address > >the obvious because in segments of the population - the > obvious - isn't. > > > >Rick [msft] > >-- > >Posting is provided "AS IS", and confers no rights or warranties ... > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Susan Bradley, > >CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] > >Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 11:08 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] FYI: MS-KBQ909360 - Potential file > corruption > >on NTFS volumes > > > >Is it me or is that a dumb KB? > > > >"A volume is full or almost full." > > > >Yeah data will start getting screwed up when you have that > situation. > >In SBSland we lose our CAL licenses and other such fun > things on a too > >tight drive. > > > > > > > >Almeida Pinto, Jorge de wrote: > > > > > > > >>FYI > >> > >>Potential file corruption problem on NTFS volumes during extensive > >>stress > >> > >> > >tests in Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1 > > > > > >>http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;909360 > >> > >>Cheers, > >>Jorge > >> > >> > >>This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended > >> > >> > >recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential > >information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be > >copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. > If you are > >not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this > e-mail and > >any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you. > > > > > >>List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > >>List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > >>List archive: > >>http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > >List archive: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > >List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > >List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > >List archive: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
